GSoC Proposal

[JAZEIX Johnny]

Hi,

I added notes to the google doc.

On 03/19/17 13:14, Rudra Nil Basu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the review,
>
> For the submarine activity, should I keep the controls same as that in 
> the Gtk+ version (this one - http://pasteboard.co/Ld3GiEquk.jpg )?

If you can make it easier, go for it.

> For the levels, I am planning to do it by explaining each of the 
> components one level at a time. For example, level 1 will just require 
> the user to
> use the engine and not any other components (by explaining the user 
> the use of the engine only and how to control it). In the 2nd level, 
> the user
> will be asked to control the depths of the submarine (by telling the 
> user how to do that via the instruction), and so on. In this way, I am 
> planning to
> increase the difficulty curve, starting from the very basic, one at a 
> time. Will this be good enough for the activity?
>

yes

Johnny
> I have updated the proposal and instead of using an expert mode, I 
> will be incorporating it as a sub-level of the family activity. Also, 
> I have added
> the time to learn to use box2d in the Community Bonding period
>
> Proposal Link - 
> https://github.com/RudraNilBasu/LaTeX-Documents/blob/master/GSoC-KDE/gsoc_2017_proposal.pdf
>
>
> - /Rudra Nil Basu/
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 3:07 AM, JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jazeix at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 03/17/17 22:22, Rudra Nil Basu wrote:
>>     Hi everyone,
>>
>>     My plans for this year's Google Summer of Code is to finish the
>>     following started activities:
>>     1. *Pilot a Submarine*: The port from Gtk+ to Qt was started in
>>     the gsoc_submarine branch, but it is
>>     almost empty, so it needs to be started from scratch
>>     2. *Family*: The core functionality of the activity is completed,
>>     I will be improving the layouts of the
>>     activity.
>>     3. *Object Arrangement*: The activity to arrange numbers and
>>     alphabets in ascending or descending
>>     order is currently in review. This activity aims at creating a
>>     generic version of arranging objects in a
>>     specific order, thus completing all types of arrangement activities.
>>
>>     Proposal Link:
>>     https://github.com/RudraNilBasu/LaTeX-Documents/blob/master/GSoC-KDE/gsoc_2017_proposal.pdf
>>     <https://github.com/RudraNilBasu/LaTeX-Documents/blob/master/GSoC-KDE/gsoc_2017_proposal.pdf>
>>
>>     I will be glad to receive feedbacks based on it and make the
>>     necessary changes
>>
>>     Thank you,
>>     - /Rudra Nil Basu/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>     Hi,
>
>     for submarine, the Gtk+ version is too complicated like that. We
>     need easier levels to start and good explanations/tuto to know how
>     to make it work.
>
>     for family, I like the new mode idea. It's not really expert mode,
>     I think it would be better to have a subactivity of the current
>     one instead.
>
>     for timeline, for submarine, I think you need to add some time to
>     learn how box2d works and can be used for the activity.
>
>     Johnny
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20170326/54b6cae4/attachment.html>