GSoC Proposal

[Rudra Nil Basu]

I also created a google doc version of my proposal, so that it becomes easy
to comment on it.

Proposal Link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dOQAEQR72_fKqJrZ_c3DjjfbtpUX7si7-QiU5R9SWx4/edit?usp=sharing


- *Rudra Nil Basu*


On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Rudra Nil Basu <
rudra.nil.basu.1996 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have updated the proposal. Main changes made are:
>
> 1. I will be working on the *digital_electricity* activity and the Object
> Arrangement activity is currently moved
> to the "Additional tasks" if I get time to work on it.
> 2. I have added the details of how I would maintain the difficulty of the
> activities, in order to make sure that
> children find it easy to learn and then increase the difficulty steadily
> to make sure that the children have
> understood it properly.
>
> Proposal Link: https://github.com/RudraNilBasu/LaTeX-Documents/
> blob/master/GSoC-KDE/gsoc_2017_proposal.pdf
>
> Feedbacks are always welcome and I will be making the necessary changes
>
> - *Rudra Nil Basu*
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Rudra Nil Basu <
> rudra.nil.basu.1996 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for the review,
>>
>> For the submarine activity, should I keep the controls same as that in
>> the Gtk+ version (this one - http://pasteboard.co/Ld3GiEquk.jpg )?
>> For the levels, I am planning to do it by explaining each of the
>> components one level at a time. For example, level 1 will just require the
>> user to
>> use the engine and not any other components (by explaining the user the
>> use of the engine only and how to control it). In the 2nd level, the user
>> will be asked to control the depths of the submarine (by telling the user
>> how to do that via the instruction), and so on. In this way, I am planning
>> to
>> increase the difficulty curve, starting from the very basic, one at a
>> time. Will this be good enough for the activity?
>>
>> I have updated the proposal and instead of using an expert mode, I will
>> be incorporating it as a sub-level of the family activity. Also, I have
>> added
>> the time to learn to use box2d in the Community Bonding period
>>
>> Proposal Link - https://github.com/RudraNilBas
>> u/LaTeX-Documents/blob/master/GSoC-KDE/gsoc_2017_proposal.pdf
>>
>>
>> - *Rudra Nil Basu*
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 3:07 AM, JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/17/17 22:22, Rudra Nil Basu wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> My plans for this year's Google Summer of Code is to finish the
>>> following started activities:
>>> 1. *Pilot a Submarine*: The port from Gtk+ to Qt was started in the
>>> gsoc_submarine branch, but it is
>>> almost empty, so it needs to be started from scratch
>>> 2. *Family*: The core functionality of the activity is completed, I
>>> will be improving the layouts of the
>>> activity.
>>> 3. *Object Arrangement*: The activity to arrange numbers and alphabets
>>> in ascending or descending
>>> order is currently in review. This activity aims at creating a generic
>>> version of arranging objects in a
>>> specific order, thus completing all types of arrangement activities.
>>>
>>> Proposal Link: https://github.com/RudraNilBasu/LaTeX-Documents/blob/m
>>> aster/GSoC-KDE/gsoc_2017_proposal.pdf
>>>
>>> I will be glad to receive feedbacks based on it and make the necessary
>>> changes
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> - *Rudra Nil Basu*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> for submarine, the Gtk+ version is too complicated like that. We need
>>> easier levels to start and good explanations/tuto to know how to make it
>>> work.
>>>
>>> for family, I like the new mode idea. It's not really expert mode, I
>>> think it would be better to have a subactivity of the current one instead.
>>>
>>> for timeline, for submarine, I think you need to add some time to learn
>>> how box2d works and can be used for the activity.
>>>
>>> Johnny
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20170321/23795404/attachment.html>