tasks/branches status

[JAZEIX Johnny]

Hi,

yes, the work is the same so for this I agree to remove the branch. 
However the task description seems different to what we do with 
categorisation.

Johnny

On 02/26/17 00:20, Emmanuel Charruau wrote:
> Hi Johnny
> Where do you see a différence between categorization and Jarvis activity?
> For me the work the same?
> Emmanuel
>
> Le 25 févr. 2017 20:17, "JAZEIX Johnny" <jazeix at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jazeix at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     as said last month, I'll make a cleaning of the branches/tasks
>     currently assigned where I didn't get news next week-end:
>
>     * I removed sok_parachute branch as we have better with land_safe
>     activity and there is no reason to have the same activity again
>     with less features.
>
>     * gsoc-submarine
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-submarine> is just
>     a basic branch without advancement (only the images are
>     displayed). I guess we can delete it and if someone wants to work
>     on it, this person can create it again, he won't lose much time.
>
>     * Sok_Activity_Awele
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=Sok_Activity_Awele>, the
>     current code is not working well but it can be used to either be
>     continued or restarted, anyone has an opinion on it or I remove it?
>
>     * SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh>
>     does not match the description of what we want to do with it
>     (https://phabricator.kde.org/T339
>     <https://phabricator.kde.org/T339>) so I'll remove the branch.
>
>     * Utkarsh started to work on djibb-place-your-satellite2
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=djibb-place-your-satellite2>
>     and I updated the task with a first set of improvements to do.
>
>     *GSoC-family
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=GSoC-family> is closed
>     to completion but improvements need to be done on the design
>     (display the elements in a grid and see if it is better).
>
>     * gsoc-sagar-electric
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-sagar-electric> is
>     empty, we can remove it, work is far more advanced in
>     gsoc_pulkit_digital_electricity
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc_pulkit_digital_electricity>
>
>     * For sok_A_Jarvis_object_classification
>     <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=sok_A_Jarvis_object_classification>
>     (https://phabricator.kde.org/T1956
>     <https://phabricator.kde.org/T1956>), can we consider it as a
>     redondant with categorisation (so we would remove it) or do we
>     keep it as a different one? The current code is like
>     categorisation so I think we can remove the branch but for the
>     task itself, I think it is different from categorisation and can
>     still be useful.
>
>     For the other branches, I haven't checked them yet but I either
>     had a status or I think the work can be continued from it. If you
>     want to add any update, don't hesitate.
>
>     By default, I'll remove the above branches and release the
>     assignments in phabricator if needed next week-end if noone says
>     he wants to continue its work.
>
>     Johnny
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20170226/1341e8f9/attachment-0001.html>