GCompris-devel Digest, Vol 28, Issue 8
Divyam Madaan
divyam3897 at gmail.com
Sun Feb 26 08:55:58 UTC 2017
hi
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:48 AM, <gcompris-devel-request at kde.org> wrote:
> Send GCompris-devel mailing list submissions to
> gcompris-devel at kde.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/gcompris-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> gcompris-devel-request at kde.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> gcompris-devel-owner at kde.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of GCompris-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. tasks/branches status (JAZEIX Johnny)
> 2. Re: tasks/branches status (Emmanuel Charruau)
> 3. Re: tasks/branches status (JAZEIX Johnny)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 20:17:06 +0100
> From: JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
> To: "gcompris-devel at kde.org" <gcompris-devel at kde.org>
> Subject: tasks/branches status
> Message-ID: <e8de7e2c-c3d4-2e38-24d3-191cb6b79dbe at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hi all,
>
> as said last month, I'll make a cleaning of the branches/tasks currently
> assigned where I didn't get news next week-end:
>
> * I removed sok_parachute branch as we have better with land_safe
> activity and there is no reason to have the same activity again with
> less features.
>
> * gsoc-submarine
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-submarine> is just a
> basic branch without advancement (only the images are displayed). I
> guess we can delete it and if someone wants to work on it, this person
> can create it again, he won't lose much time.
>
> * Sok_Activity_Awele
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=Sok_Activity_Awele>, the
> current code is not working well but it can be used to either be
> continued or restarted, anyone has an opinion on it or I remove it?
>
> I checked this one out. I would propose this activity for my GSoc(single
and multiplayer). I would start from scratch probably but may be it can ke
be kept to take the useful things and I can filter things out while working?
> * SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh
> >
> does not match the description of what we want to do with it
> (https://phabricator.kde.org/T339) so I'll remove the branch.
>
> * Utkarsh started to work on djibb-place-your-satellite2
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=djibb-place-your-satellite2>
> and I updated the task with a first set of improvements to do.
>
> *GSoC-family <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=GSoC-family> is
> closed to completion but improvements need to be done on the design
> (display the elements in a grid and see if it is better).
>
> * gsoc-sagar-electric
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-sagar-electric> is empty,
> we can remove it, work is far more advanced in
> gsoc_pulkit_digital_electricity
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc_pulkit_digital_electricity>
>
> * For sok_A_Jarvis_object_classification
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=sok_A_
> Jarvis_object_classification>
> (https://phabricator.kde.org/T1956), can we consider it as a redondant
> with categorisation (so we would remove it) or do we keep it as a
> different one? The current code is like categorisation so I think we can
> remove the branch but for the task itself, I think it is different from
> categorisation and can still be useful.
>
> For the other branches, I haven't checked them yet but I either had a
> status or I think the work can be continued from it. If you want to add
> any update, don't hesitate.
>
> Also check the branch "gsoc-sagar-computer
<https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-sagar-computer>" I checked
this one also It has a computer animation showing how a computer starts.
May be it can be open for discussion and can be improved? I plan to
complete the musical activities and oware most prbably so I would release
the task if I am unable to plan this one :)
> By default, I'll remove the above branches and release the assignments
> in phabricator if needed next week-end if noone says he wants to
> continue its work.
>
> Johnny
>
> Thank you
Regards
Divyam Madaan
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/
> attachments/20170225/fe34aeaa/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 00:20:17 +0100
> From: Emmanuel Charruau <echarruau at gmail.com>
> To: JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
> Cc: GCompris Devel <gcompris-devel at kde.org>
> Subject: Re: tasks/branches status
> Message-ID:
> <CA+jbWcHnyh1X6Djyyy+aZfg0ZQnBaMG6dw3xR+nv9BJJhUM-
> gQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Johnny
> Where do you see a différence between categorization and Jarvis activity?
> For me the work the same?
> Emmanuel
>
> Le 25 févr. 2017 20:17, "JAZEIX Johnny" <jazeix at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > as said last month, I'll make a cleaning of the branches/tasks currently
> > assigned where I didn't get news next week-end:
> >
> > * I removed sok_parachute branch as we have better with land_safe
> activity
> > and there is no reason to have the same activity again with less
> features.
> >
> > * gsoc-submarine <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-
> submarine>
> > is just a basic branch without advancement (only the images are
> displayed).
> > I guess we can delete it and if someone wants to work on it, this person
> > can create it again, he won't lose much time.
> >
> > * Sok_Activity_Awele
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=Sok_Activity_Awele>, the
> > current code is not working well but it can be used to either be
> continued
> > or restarted, anyone has an opinion on it or I remove it?
> >
> > * SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=SoK_
> Activity_recyclebin_shivansh>
> > does not match the description of what we want to do with it (
> > https://phabricator.kde.org/T339) so I'll remove the branch.
> >
> > * Utkarsh started to work on djibb-place-your-satellite2
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=djibb-place-your-satellite2>
> > and I updated the task with a first set of improvements to do.
> >
> > * GSoC-family <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=GSoC-family> is
> > closed to completion but improvements need to be done on the design
> > (display the elements in a grid and see if it is better).
> >
> > * gsoc-sagar-electric
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-sagar-electric> is empty,
> > we can remove it, work is far more advanced in gsoc_pulkit_digital_
> > electricity
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc_
> pulkit_digital_electricity>
> >
> > * For sok_A_Jarvis_object_classification
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=sok_A_
> Jarvis_object_classification>
> > (https://phabricator.kde.org/T1956), can we consider it as a redondant
> > with categorisation (so we would remove it) or do we keep it as a
> different
> > one? The current code is like categorisation so I think we can remove the
> > branch but for the task itself, I think it is different from
> categorisation
> > and can still be useful.
> >
> > For the other branches, I haven't checked them yet but I either had a
> > status or I think the work can be continued from it. If you want to add
> any
> > update, don't hesitate.
> >
> > By default, I'll remove the above branches and release the assignments in
> > phabricator if needed next week-end if noone says he wants to continue
> its
> > work.
> >
> > Johnny
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/
> attachments/20170226/b64ce17e/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 09:48:13 +0100
> From: JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
> To: Emmanuel Charruau <echarruau at gmail.com>
> Cc: GCompris Devel <gcompris-devel at kde.org>
> Subject: Re: tasks/branches status
> Message-ID: <9a99c14f-cab8-851d-d6b5-005d176772fd at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hi,
>
> yes, the work is the same so for this I agree to remove the branch.
> However the task description seems different to what we do with
> categorisation.
>
> Johnny
>
> On 02/26/17 00:20, Emmanuel Charruau wrote:
> > Hi Johnny
> > Where do you see a différence between categorization and Jarvis activity?
> > For me the work the same?
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > Le 25 févr. 2017 20:17, "JAZEIX Johnny" <jazeix at gmail.com
> > <mailto:jazeix at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > as said last month, I'll make a cleaning of the branches/tasks
> > currently assigned where I didn't get news next week-end:
> >
> > * I removed sok_parachute branch as we have better with land_safe
> > activity and there is no reason to have the same activity again
> > with less features.
> >
> > * gsoc-submarine
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-submarine> is just
> > a basic branch without advancement (only the images are
> > displayed). I guess we can delete it and if someone wants to work
> > on it, this person can create it again, he won't lose much time.
> >
> > * Sok_Activity_Awele
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=Sok_Activity_Awele>, the
> > current code is not working well but it can be used to either be
> > continued or restarted, anyone has an opinion on it or I remove it?
> >
> > * SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=SoK_
> Activity_recyclebin_shivansh>
> > does not match the description of what we want to do with it
> > (https://phabricator.kde.org/T339
> > <https://phabricator.kde.org/T339>) so I'll remove the branch.
> >
> > * Utkarsh started to work on djibb-place-your-satellite2
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=djibb-
> place-your-satellite2>
> > and I updated the task with a first set of improvements to do.
> >
> > *GSoC-family
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=GSoC-family> is closed
> > to completion but improvements need to be done on the design
> > (display the elements in a grid and see if it is better).
> >
> > * gsoc-sagar-electric
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-sagar-electric> is
> > empty, we can remove it, work is far more advanced in
> > gsoc_pulkit_digital_electricity
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc_
> pulkit_digital_electricity>
> >
> > * For sok_A_Jarvis_object_classification
> > <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=sok_A_
> Jarvis_object_classification>
> > (https://phabricator.kde.org/T1956
> > <https://phabricator.kde.org/T1956>), can we consider it as a
> > redondant with categorisation (so we would remove it) or do we
> > keep it as a different one? The current code is like
> > categorisation so I think we can remove the branch but for the
> > task itself, I think it is different from categorisation and can
> > still be useful.
> >
> > For the other branches, I haven't checked them yet but I either
> > had a status or I think the work can be continued from it. If you
> > want to add any update, don't hesitate.
> >
> > By default, I'll remove the above branches and release the
> > assignments in phabricator if needed next week-end if noone says
> > he wants to continue its work.
> >
> > Johnny
> >
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/
> attachments/20170226/1341e8f9/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> GCompris-devel mailing list
> GCompris-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/gcompris-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of GCompris-devel Digest, Vol 28, Issue 8
> *********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20170226/01148f65/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the GCompris-devel
mailing list