tasks/branches status

[Emmanuel Charruau]

Hi Johnny
Where do you see a différence between categorization and Jarvis activity?
For me the work the same?
Emmanuel

Le 25 févr. 2017 20:17, "JAZEIX Johnny" <jazeix at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> as said last month, I'll make a cleaning of the branches/tasks currently
> assigned where I didn't get news next week-end:
>
> * I removed sok_parachute branch as we have better with land_safe activity
> and there is no reason to have the same activity again with less features.
>
> * gsoc-submarine <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-submarine>
> is just a basic branch without advancement (only the images are displayed).
> I guess we can delete it and if someone wants to work on it, this person
> can create it again, he won't lose much time.
>
> * Sok_Activity_Awele
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=Sok_Activity_Awele>, the
> current code is not working well but it can be used to either be continued
> or restarted, anyone has an opinion on it or I remove it?
>
> * SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=SoK_Activity_recyclebin_shivansh>
> does not match the description of what we want to do with it (
> https://phabricator.kde.org/T339) so I'll remove the branch.
>
> * Utkarsh started to work on djibb-place-your-satellite2
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=djibb-place-your-satellite2>
> and I updated the task with a first set of improvements to do.
>
> * GSoC-family <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=GSoC-family> is
> closed to completion but improvements need to be done on the design
> (display the elements in a grid and see if it is better).
>
> * gsoc-sagar-electric
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc-sagar-electric> is empty,
> we can remove it, work is far more advanced in gsoc_pulkit_digital_
> electricity
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=gsoc_pulkit_digital_electricity>
>
> * For sok_A_Jarvis_object_classification
> <https://cgit.kde.org/gcompris.git/log/?h=sok_A_Jarvis_object_classification>
> (https://phabricator.kde.org/T1956), can we consider it as a redondant
> with categorisation (so we would remove it) or do we keep it as a different
> one? The current code is like categorisation so I think we can remove the
> branch but for the task itself, I think it is different from categorisation
> and can still be useful.
>
> For the other branches, I haven't checked them yet but I either had a
> status or I think the work can be continued from it. If you want to add any
> update, don't hesitate.
>
> By default, I'll remove the above branches and release the assignments in
> phabricator if needed next week-end if noone says he wants to continue its
> work.
>
> Johnny
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20170226/b64ce17e/attachment.html>