SoK Proposal

[Ütkarsh Tiwari]

Hi Johnny,
                 Would you like to suggest any other improvements in my
proposal?

Regards,
Utkarsh Tiwari

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Johnny Jazeix <jazeix at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 2016-10-18 15:19 GMT+02:00 Ütkarsh Tiwari <iamutkarshtiwari at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Checker:
>>                  I'll have to go through the both javascript and python
>> based codes and then decide which would be easier to port (for checkers).
>>
>> Place your satellite:
>>                  Could you please list some bugs (cosmetics as mentioned
>> by the developers) which needs to be fixed ?
>>
>
> I haven't tested for a long time so as far as I remember, the user
> interface wasn't clean enough.
>
>
>>
>> SoK application portal:
>>                  Do we have to provide the link to the proposal or just
>> copy/paste the proposal contents in the area provided in the application
>> portal?
>>
>
> Copy/paste
>
> Johnny
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Johnny Jazeix <jazeix at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-10-17 17:14 GMT+02:00 Ütkarsh Tiwari <iamutkarshtiwari at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>     Stumbled upon this code today on github -
>>>> https://github.com/UWOneLaptop/Checkers . It's AI uses 'Alpha-beta'
>>>> pruning algorithm for making the best move. It's written on pygame and I
>>>> think that I can port it. What do you suggest?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> There is no explicit license to the code. As the code is in python and
>>> not js, it may be better to start from scratch?
>>> There seem to be some in js: https://github.com/search?utf8
>>> =%E2%9C%93&q=checkers+language%3AJavaScript&type=Repositorie
>>> s&ref=advsearch&l=JavaScript&l=
>>> It's up to you to decide which one will be easier to maintain.
>>>
>>>
>>>>     I tried the already existing 'place_your_satellite' branch
>>>> developed by JB Butet. It seems good to me. Shall I propose some other
>>>> activity in my proposal as this activity already seems complete.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well, it needs to be cleaned (at least for graphical interface):
>>> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/2015-March/004185.html)
>>> and tested more.
>>> I think it's more improving and integrating it than recoding it.
>>>
>>> Johnny
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>> Utkarsh Tiwari
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:44 PM, JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> for checkers, have you looked if there are existing AI that would be
>>>>> simplier to integrate that recoding it?
>>>>>
>>>>> for place_your_satellite, there is already an existing branch, have
>>>>> you checked if it can be continued from it? There was some algorithm
>>>>> already developed in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> For me you won't have time to do everything but you can keep it like
>>>>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Johnny
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/15/16 00:49, Ütkarsh Tiwari wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>      Here is my proposal for the Season of KDE'16 programme. Please
>>>>> review it and share your suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Link - https://github.com/iamutkarshtiwari/iamutkarshtiwari.github.
>>>>> io/blob/master/SoK_proposal.md
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Ütkarsh Tiwari
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Ütkarsh Tiwari
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Ütkarsh Tiwari
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,
Ütkarsh Tiwari
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20161019/b2d86901/attachment-0001.html>