GCompris-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17

nitish chauhan nitish.nc18 at gmail.com
Sun Oct 16 21:00:14 UTC 2016


Hi,
regarding SOK proposal :-

1.) Yes, we can have a activity for all 4 operators.
2.) For week 2-3 , yes I have added the demo screenshots.
3.) I have not checked the license yet. I think there will be no
problem.But,still I will check it :)
4.) For week 7-8, 55 because :-

for 1 :- 10 questions
for 2 :- 9 questions
for 3 :- 8 questions
for 4 :- 7
for 5   :- 6
for 6   :- 5
for 7  :- 4
for 8  :- 3
for 9  :- 2
for 10 :: 1

total :- 55 question

5.) Your Idea of two modes is quite nice, I will surely discuss this with
Emmanuel.


regards,
Nitish

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 9:13 PM, <gcompris-devel-request at kde.org> wrote:

> Send GCompris-devel mailing list submissions to
>         gcompris-devel at kde.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/gcompris-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         gcompris-devel-request at kde.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         gcompris-devel-owner at kde.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of GCompris-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. SoK proposal (Divyam Madaan)
>    2. Re: SoK Proposal (JAZEIX Johnny)
>    3. Re: Season of KDE proposal review (JAZEIX Johnny)
>    4. Re: SoK proposal (JAZEIX Johnny)
>    5. Re: Season of KDE proposal review (Emmanuel Charruau)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 14:46:24 +0000
> From: Divyam Madaan <divyam3897 at gmail.com>
> To: gcompris-devel at kde.org
> Subject: SoK proposal
> Message-ID:
>         <CABRC7rrDjG9QFKFW1w-Kc5Pi0Djp22wsN3Py8OMjdBW-
> CRXVZg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I am Divyam Madaan, a 2nd year student of UIET, PU,  Chandigarh, India. I
> have been contributing to GCompris from quite a few months and I will try
> my best to give my best to our awesome community :) I would be glad to get
> reviews and suggestions on my proposal. Also feel free to test my activity
> "Categorization" https://github.com/gcompris/GCompris-qt/pull/161 and give
> your reviews.
>
> Link to my proposal:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NkYPVErDjJ1Ttn5TGCeWivQgLLnxt
> XSKcf3y8r7VJCI/edit
>
> Thank you
> Regards
> Divyam Madaan
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/
> attachments/20161016/deedcb1d/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:14:55 +0200
> From: JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
> To: gcompris-devel at kde.org
> Subject: Re: SoK Proposal
> Message-ID: <0be2a5c3-e169-911a-1148-a53b4537ec77 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hi,
>
> for checkers, have you looked if there are existing AI that would be
> simplier to integrate that recoding it?
>
> for place_your_satellite, there is already an existing branch, have you
> checked if it can be continued from it? There was some algorithm already
> developed in it.
>
> For me you won't have time to do everything but you can keep it like this.
>
> Johnny
>
> On 10/15/16 00:49, Ütkarsh Tiwari wrote:
> > Hi,
> >      Here is my proposal for the Season of KDE'16 programme. Please
> > review it and share your suggestions.
> >
> > Link -
> > https://github.com/iamutkarshtiwari/iamutkarshtiwari.github.io/
> blob/master/SoK_proposal.md
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ütkarsh Tiwari
> >
> >
> >
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/
> attachments/20161016/8178ac10/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:15:04 +0200
> From: JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
> To: gcompris-devel at kde.org
> Subject: Re: Season of KDE proposal review
> Message-ID: <ad7b34fc-8727-1cbb-9f77-c22f50ffe733 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hi,
>
> is there an interest to have the activity for the 4 operators and not
> only for the multiplication?
>
> For the discussions, don't limit it with the mentor but all the mailing
> list. Even if you are only two discussing, it's good for everyone to
> know the progress and what is planned so if anyone has comments, he can
> share them.
>
> For week 2-3, is it the screenshot you added?
>
> For week 4-6, have you checked if the license of the code allow us to
> use it?
>
> For week 7-8, why 55 (10+...+1)? If you store 3*7, you don't store 7*3?
>
> Documentation should be done while coding not at the end :).
>
> I'm not sure of the usefulness of the chrono, what do you do of the
> result? Is it just informative for the session?
>
> I think the setting window should be part of the admin/server side and
> the teacher will send the dataset he wants to the tablets. As it is not
> yet developed, we can do it in the activity itself first but you have to
> keep in mind that it could be moved so the code has to be done
> "properly" so we can move it without having to change everything.
>
> For me, we can have two modes, the "school" mode where the dataset is
> provided by the teacher (basically the settings window) and the "normal"
> mode (not in a classroom, a child at home) where each level should
> contain all the tables for one number (level 1 with the 10
> multiplications for table of 1, level 2 for 2...).
> If we do like this, in the "school" mode, we won't have the difficulty
> to be sure that all the children have the same questions because the
> dataset will be predefined on teacher side.
>
> Johnny
>
> On 10/15/16 21:59, Emmanuel Charruau wrote:
> >
> > Ok understood.  But not sure you should put it as a step.
> >
> >
> > Le 15 oct. 2016 21:46, "nitish chauhan" <nitish.nc18 at gmail.com
> > <mailto:nitish.nc18 at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> >
> >     Hi,
> >     Actually in this, I was planning to store all the questions in
> >     form of ArrayList or Array. Just as we have stored coordinates of
> >     pictures in drawnumber or Drawletters Activity.
> >
> >     In the setting window total no. of max questions will be
> >     10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 55
> >     So, I was planning to store these questions in a
> >     ArrayList(num1,num2) of size 55.
> >     Also, between this time I will be having my EndSem exam, that's
> >     why I have written 2 week for this task, because I will not be
> >     able to devote much time between these week.
> >
> >     regards,
> >     Nitish
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >     On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Emmanuel Charruau
> >     <echarruau at gmail.com <mailto:echarruau at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         Hi Nitish,
> >
> >         I don't understand the following
> >
> >         .) Week 7-8 :-​ Will add DATASET for all the Questions , that the
> >         teacher wants the students to learn.
> >         Dataset will be stored in JavaScript file for
> >
> >         Could you explain more in details ?
> >
> >         Thanks
> >
> >         Emmanuel
> >
> >
> >         Le 15 oct. 2016 17:02, "nitish chauhan" <nitish.nc18 at gmail.com
> >         <mailto:nitish.nc18 at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> >
> >             Hi,
> >             myself Nitish Chauhan .Link to my SOK proposal :-
> >             https://drive.google.com/open?id=
> 0B7HqST8hfydOYnRhSVN4QlJraVU
> >             <https://drive.google.com/open?id=
> 0B7HqST8hfydOYnRhSVN4QlJraVU>
> >
> >
> >             Will be happy to receive suggestions & reviews.
> >
> >             thanks & regards,
> >
> >             Nitish Chauhan
> >
> >
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/
> attachments/20161016/88ae42fd/attachment-0001.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:15:05 +0200
> From: JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
> To: gcompris-devel at kde.org
> Subject: Re: SoK proposal
> Message-ID: <01f5af85-10c8-b710-8f8e-a0b9a3cb2fa1 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> how do you plan to handle the translations for the words activity?
>
> What do you plan to do in the configuration for words that is different
> from the configuration of images?
>
> Johnny
>
> On 10/16/16 16:46, Divyam Madaan wrote:
> > Hello Everyone,
> >
> > I am Divyam Madaan, a 2nd year student of UIET, PU, Chandigarh, India.
> > I have been contributing to GCompris from quite a few months and I
> > will try my best to give my best to our awesome community :) I would
> > be glad to get reviews and suggestions on my proposal. Also feel free
> > to test my activity "Categorization"
> > https://github.com/gcompris/GCompris-qt/pull/161 and give your reviews.
> >
> > Link to my proposal:
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NkYPVErDjJ1Ttn5TGCeWivQgLLnxt
> XSKcf3y8r7VJCI/edit
> >
> > Thank you
> > Regards
> > Divyam Madaan
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 17:43:10 +0200
> From: Emmanuel Charruau <echarruau at gmail.com>
> To: JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>
> Cc: GCompris Devel <gcompris-devel at kde.org>
> Subject: Re: Season of KDE proposal review
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+jbWcFLe6fT6qiG6-S94YUH7X8ipCDoaw5i_Ru84KmTJ9_
> 7wQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Johhny,
>
> I can answer some of the questions.
> In your email.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> 2016-10-16 17:15 GMT+02:00 JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there an interest to have the activity for the 4 operators and not
> only
> > for the multiplication?
> >
>
> You are totally right this is also interesting for addition and
> soustractions.
>
>
> >
> > For the discussions, don't limit it with the mentor but all the mailing
> > list. Even if you are only two discussing, it's good for everyone to know
> > the progress and what is planned so if anyone has comments, he can share
> > them.
> >
> > For week 2-3, is it the screenshot you added?
> >
>
>
> > For week 4-6, have you checked if the license of the code allow us to use
> > it?
> >
>
> > For week 7-8, why 55 (10+...+1)? If you store 3*7, you don't store 7*3?
> >
>
> You don't store 7*3, this is one of the concept of the method to help
> children to learn less. But this is a very interesting point, the activity
> will have to ask 3*7 and 7*3 as we want to build automatisation here and
> some of the children do not manage to see that 3*7 is = to 7*3.
>
>
> >
> > Documentation should be done while coding not at the end :).
> >
> > I'm not sure of the usefulness of the chrono, what do you do of the
> > result? Is it just informative for the session?
> >
>
> I need a chrono. To be able to put pupils in competition. They really like
> it, it is not only to create competition, but also to record progression. I
> write down the lime on a paper on the wall at the moment, and it really
> motivates children to see that they are quicker and quicker.
>
>
> >
> > I think the setting window should be part of the admin/server side and
> the
> > teacher will send the dataset he wants to the tablets. As it is not yet
> > developed, we can do it in the activity itself first but you have to keep
> > in mind that it could be moved so the code has to be done "properly" so
> we
> > can move it without having to change everything.
> >
> > For me, we can have two modes, the "school" mode where the dataset is
> > provided by the teacher (basically the settings window) and the "normal"
> > mode (not in a classroom, a child at home) where each level should
> contain
> > all the tables for one number (level 1 with the 10 multiplications for
> > table of 1, level 2 for 2...).
> > If we do like this, in the "school" mode, we won't have the difficulty to
> > be sure that all the children have the same questions because the dataset
> > will be predefined on teacher side.
> >
>
> As at the begining we will not have network, I still would like to have a
> mode where children could set individual multiplications by hand. Iy will
> work this way on the class. The teacher say, today we will add 2*3 and 9*5,
> go to settings display and click on them. This way all the children will
> have the same questions.
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Johnny
> >
> > On 10/15/16 21:59, Emmanuel Charruau wrote:
> >
> > Ok understood.  But not sure you should put it as a step.
> >
> > Le 15 oct. 2016 21:46, "nitish chauhan" <nitish.nc18 at gmail.com> a écrit
> :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> Actually in this, I was planning to store all the questions in form of
> >> ArrayList or Array. Just as we have stored coordinates of pictures in
> >> drawnumber or Drawletters Activity.
> >>
> >> In the setting window total no. of max questions will be
> >> 10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 55
> >> So, I was planning to store these questions in a ArrayList(num1,num2) of
> >> size 55.
> >> Also, between this time I will be having my EndSem exam, that's why I
> >> have written 2 week for this task, because I will not be able to devote
> >> much time between these week.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Nitish
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Emmanuel Charruau <
> echarruau at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Nitish,
> >>>
> >>> I don't understand the following
> >>>
> >>> .) Week 7-8 :-​ Will add DATASET for all the Questions , that the
> >>> teacher wants the students to learn.
> >>> Dataset will be stored in JavaScript file for
> >>>
> >>> Could you explain more in details ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Emmanuel
> >>>
> >>> Le 15 oct. 2016 17:02, "nitish chauhan" <nitish.nc18 at gmail.com> a
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> myself Nitish Chauhan .Link to my SOK proposal :-
> >>>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7HqST8hfydOYnRhSVN4QlJraVU
> >>>>
> >>>> Will be happy to receive suggestions & reviews.
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks & regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Nitish Chauhan
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/
> attachments/20161016/41d7113a/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> GCompris-devel mailing list
> GCompris-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/gcompris-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of GCompris-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 17
> **********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20161017/3714e542/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the GCompris-devel mailing list