Season of KDE proposal review

Sun Oct 16 19:54:04 UTC 2016

Hi,

On 10/16/16 17:43, Emmanuel Charruau wrote:
> Hi Johnny,
>
> I can answer some of the questions.
> In your email.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> 2016-10-16 17:15 GMT+02:00 JAZEIX Johnny <jazeix at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jazeix at gmail.com>>:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     is there an interest to have the activity for the 4 operators and
>     not only for the multiplication?
>
>
> You are totally right this is also interesting for addition and 
> soustractions.
>
>
>     For the discussions, don't limit it with the mentor but all the
>     mailing list. Even if you are only two discussing, it's good for
>     everyone to know the progress and what is planned so if anyone has
>     comments, he can share them.
>
>     For week 2-3, is it the screenshot you added?
>
>
>
>     For week 4-6, have you checked if the license of the code allow us
>     to use it?
>
>
>     For week 7-8, why 55 (10+...+1)? If you store 3*7, you don't store
>     7*3?
>
>
> You don't store 7*3, this is one of the concept of the method to help 
> children to learn less. But this is a very interesting point, the 
> activity will have to ask 3*7 and 7*3 as we want to build 
> automatisation here and some of the children do not manage to see that 
> 3*7 is = to 7*3.

Then, I still don't understand the 55 :).

>
>     Documentation should be done while coding not at the end :).
>
>     I'm not sure of the usefulness of the chrono, what do you do of
>     the result? Is it just informative for the session?
>
>
> I need a chrono. To be able to put pupils in competition. They really 
> like it, it is not only to create competition, but also to record 
> progression. I write down the lime on a paper on the wall at the 
> moment, and it really motivates children to see that they are quicker 
> and quicker.
>
>
>     I think the setting window should be part of the admin/server side
>     and the teacher will send the dataset he wants to the tablets. As
>     it is not yet developed, we can do it in the activity itself first
>     but you have to keep in mind that it could be moved so the code
>     has to be done "properly" so we can move it without having to
>     change everything.
>
>     For me, we can have two modes, the "school" mode where the dataset
>     is provided by the teacher (basically the settings window) and the
>     "normal" mode (not in a classroom, a child at home) where each
>     level should contain all the tables for one number (level 1 with
>     the 10 multiplications for table of 1, level 2 for 2...).
>     If we do like this, in the "school" mode, we won't have the
>     difficulty to be sure that all the children have the same
>     questions because the dataset will be predefined on teacher side.
>
>
> As at the begining we will not have network, I still would like to 
> have a mode where children could set individual multiplications by 
> hand. Iy will work this way on the class. The teacher say, today we 
> will add 2*3 and 9*5, go to settings display and click on them. This 
> way all the children will have the same questions.
>
Yes, as long as we don't have the network/server, we can have the mode 
directly in the client. But with the network, won't it be easier for 
both children and teacher that the teacher sends the dataset at startup?

>
>
>
>     Johnny
>
>     On 10/15/16 21:59, Emmanuel Charruau wrote:
>>
>>     Ok understood.  But not sure you should put it as a step.
>>
>>
>>     Le 15 oct. 2016 21:46, "nitish chauhan" <nitish.nc18 at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:nitish.nc18 at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>         Hi,
>>         Actually in this, I was planning to store all the questions
>>         in form of ArrayList or Array. Just as we have stored
>>         coordinates of pictures in drawnumber or Drawletters Activity.
>>
>>         In the setting window total no. of max questions will be
>>         10+9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 55
>>         So, I was planning to store these questions in a
>>         ArrayList(num1,num2) of size 55.
>>         Also, between this time I will be having my EndSem exam,
>>         that's why I have written 2 week for this task, because I
>>         will not be able to devote much time between these week.
>>
>>         regards,
>>         Nitish
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Emmanuel Charruau
>>         <echarruau at gmail.com <mailto:echarruau at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             Hi Nitish,
>>
>>             I don't understand the following
>>
>>             .) Week 7-8 :- Will add DATASET for all the Questions ,
>>             that the
>>             teacher wants the students to learn.
>>             Dataset will be stored in JavaScript file for
>>
>>             Could you explain more in details ?
>>
>>             Thanks
>>
>>             Emmanuel
>>
>>
>>             Le 15 oct. 2016 17:02, "nitish chauhan"
>>             <nitish.nc18 at gmail.com <mailto:nitish.nc18 at gmail.com>> a
>>             écrit :
>>
>>                 Hi,
>>                 myself Nitish Chauhan .Link to my SOK proposal :-
>>                 https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7HqST8hfydOYnRhSVN4QlJraVU
>>                 <https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B7HqST8hfydOYnRhSVN4QlJraVU>
>>
>>
>>                 Will be happy to receive suggestions & reviews.
>>
>>                 thanks & regards,
>>
>>                 Nitish Chauhan
>>
>>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/gcompris-devel/attachments/20161016/8581d804/attachment-0001.html>