[digiKam-users] why do I rejoin Digikam MailMan list?
Andrew Goodbody
ajg02 at elfringham.co.uk
Tue Jan 18 08:53:18 GMT 2022
I am very much against using a forum. They are slower and take more
effort to read.
Andrew
On 18/01/2022 08:13, Jack Marxer wrote:
> I want to thank the digiKam developers for all the work they have done
> in developing and maintaining such a wonderful program!
>
> I also would like to use a forum, but I don't know if there is someone
> who would be willing to develop and maintain it.
> Jack Marxer
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:03 AM Ty Mayn <tyrus.mayn at gmail.com
> <mailto:tyrus.mayn at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> After study of the public viewable archives I see that discussion
> is more immediate on this oldfashioned Mailman listservice. Its
> clear to me that it is small but has some responsive leaders with
> knowledge.
> Meanwhile the similarly named digikam Forum hosted by kde is
> small and more inactive. After posting there this January I resorted
> to answering my own posting just to be partially useful
> https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256
> <https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256>
> The energy on this list service deserves better tools.
> https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/
> <https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/>
> The archive has at least 17 years of useful knowledge zipped into
> 204 separate months that no newcomer (or even old user)will easily
> search.
> Has anyone ever prepared and circulated a consolidated archive
> ready for global search?
> Every posting member has their participating email exposed to
> weak masking that only replaces @ with "at" while the forum tools
> at KDE have good authentication and member shelter.
> Am I the only one to have spoken on this issue? I would have to
> search the archives to know but I suppose each current member has a
> view and every pattern has inertia. Please accept this as a
> positive input on a good thing
> Ty Mayn
>
>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list