[digiKam-users] Bye bye digikam?

[Mica Semrick]

There is an option in darktable to view the edit you've made instead of the embedded jpeg in the light table view. So Light room isn't the only one.

-m

On July 28, 2021 3:36:50 AM PDT, Olivier Croquette <ocroquette at free.fr> wrote:
>On 27/07/2021 13:14, Øystein Andresen-Sund wrote:
>> Most RAW applications do this, including Adobe Lightroom (unless you 
>> go to edit mode). Rendering directly from RAW would slow down the 
>> viewing and browsing process considerably and you would probably see 
>> an image with different colors than what you see in your camera.
>> Try using RawTherapee or Darktable for RAW processing.
>
>Lightroom does something that neither DK, RT or DT do: it caches the 
>processed image, so that it is what I see when browsing. It is the best
>
>of both world: displaying is quick, but I see what matters to me. Once
>I 
>have defined processing settings in RT or DT, the embedded preview in 
>the RAW file is completely irrelevant and can even more hurt than it 
>helps if the processing changes the image substantially, for instance 
>major cropping.
>
>Questions to the developers: would it be thinkable to call RT or DT to 
>render the image, and store this as preview in the DK database, instead
>
>of the embedded one?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20210728/cb8bfca1/attachment.htm>