[digiKam-users] The future of 6.0.0 bundles and C++11 support...

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Sun Apr 1 22:18:29 BST 2018


Did you real well my original mail ?

I never speak about the non compatibility of whole digiKam and 32 bits
support. I speak only about bundles, and especially the AppImage compiled
under CentoOS 6.9 for binary compatibility reasons.

The linux distro packages in 32 bits can be available. After all the code
is free to use. You can also compile the code yourself if all puzzle parts
are present on your 32 bits system : compiler, shared libs, etc...

Best

Gilles Caulier



2018-04-01 22:34 GMT+02:00 Andrey Goreev <aegoreev at gmail.com>:

> Would it be possible to compile 32bit versions of digiKam 6+ at all? If it
> is possible but is too much work it might worth to try compiling 32bit
> version once in a while, e.g. 6.0.0. and then 6.9.0 or whichever is the
> last version in 6 series.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Dan Kaczor <djkarch at djkarch.com>
> Date: 2018-04-01 1:26 PM (GMT-07:00)
> To: digikam-users at kde.org
> Subject: [digiKam-users] The future of 6.0.0 bundles and C++11 support...
>
> Among the many reasons some of us have switched from Windows to Linux
> was the ability to preserve older investments in computer hardware. We
> have 6 computers currently in the house, only 2 are Windows, 1 is a
> laptop with Windows x64. The other 4 computers are running 32 bit Linux
> of various OS's. We also get donated old computers from people. We make
> some simple refurbishments, install Linux (usually Mint 17+ or 18) and
> put Digikam on all of them then give them to families and the elderly
> who cannot afford computers.
>
> So I vote not to drop Digikam 32 bits. Otherwise we will stop updating
> Digikam at whatever version 32 bits support is ended.
>
> Dan
> Using Digikam since 2.5 (I think)
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20180401/c1e2266f/attachment.html>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list