Pictures in Tableview not displayed in Thumbnailview

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Thu Aug 24 07:47:01 BST 2017


yes, it's safe to apply the patch on 5.3.0, only if the patch work as
expected of course. This is why the feddback in bugzilla is important.

Gilles Caulier

2017-08-24 8:30 GMT+02:00 Gurvan Huiban <gugs.ml at free.fr>:
> Hello, and thanks for your quick reply!
>
>> This is probably the bugzilla entry for your problem :
>>
>> https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375483
>>
>> Samsung make a mess in Exif metadata and do not follow the standard.
> [...]
>
>> 1/ use a new account, and run 5.7.0 with a fresh database.
>> 2/ import samsung image in your collection and look if image still
>> here when scan is completed.
>>
>> If it work, report your tests in the bugzilla file.
>
> I will do the test with the digikam version you provided me.
>
> As the patch does not impact a lot of files, do you think the patch would apply
> on the Digikam 5.3 version? So that I could easily re-generate a debian
> package.
>
>> For your original database, we have now a maintenance tool in digiKam
>> to clean up the database tables. But i'm not sure if the Samsung case
>> is handled in this process. Another test case is to force the database
>> to re-read the file metadata. This must be talk in bugzilla as well.
>
> I can also do the test with the patched software: re-reading the metadata, and
> see if everything works.
>
> I will report the results of those tests in the bugzilla. (I am not sure I
> will have time to carry them out before the week-end, though).
>
>> Thanks in advance
>
> Thank you!
>
> Gurvan



More information about the Digikam-users mailing list