Pictures in Tableview not displayed in Thumbnailview
caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Thu Aug 24 07:47:01 BST 2017
yes, it's safe to apply the patch on 5.3.0, only if the patch work as
expected of course. This is why the feddback in bugzilla is important.
2017-08-24 8:30 GMT+02:00 Gurvan Huiban <gugs.ml at free.fr>:
> Hello, and thanks for your quick reply!
>> This is probably the bugzilla entry for your problem :
>> Samsung make a mess in Exif metadata and do not follow the standard.
>> 1/ use a new account, and run 5.7.0 with a fresh database.
>> 2/ import samsung image in your collection and look if image still
>> here when scan is completed.
>> If it work, report your tests in the bugzilla file.
> I will do the test with the digikam version you provided me.
> As the patch does not impact a lot of files, do you think the patch would apply
> on the Digikam 5.3 version? So that I could easily re-generate a debian
>> For your original database, we have now a maintenance tool in digiKam
>> to clean up the database tables. But i'm not sure if the Samsung case
>> is handled in this process. Another test case is to force the database
>> to re-read the file metadata. This must be talk in bugzilla as well.
> I can also do the test with the patched software: re-reading the metadata, and
> see if everything works.
> I will report the results of those tests in the bugzilla. (I am not sure I
> will have time to carry them out before the week-end, though).
>> Thanks in advance
> Thank you!
More information about the Digikam-users