.dtrash is empty and full?

[Gilles Caulier]

You are right, but...

1/ It permit to run digiKam on Linux distro where it's not packaged.
2/ It permit to use the last stable version quickly.
3/ It permit to use version on development and to test last changes from
developers, few hours are a patch applied to source code
4/ It permit to non developer users to use last code without to compile
anything
5/ It permit to have a bundle of all dependencies required by digiKam
packaged well as it must do for the application in goal to have something
stable as it must.
6/ Windows and OSX use this bundle way to deploy applications, and it's
work. Why not under Linux too...
7/ ... And more...

Gilles Caulier

2016-11-04 23:10 GMT+01:00 Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists at gmx.net>:

> Am 01.11.2016 um 20:44 schrieb Boudewijn:
>
>> On Monday, October 31, 2016 10:34:03 PM CET Peter Mc Donough wrote:
>>
>>> Am 31.10.2016 um 19:25 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
>>>
>>>> There is a digiKam trash for each collection (local or removable). You
>>>> cannot use KDE trash with a link.
>>>>
>>>> With 5.3.0, we have fixed some problem with trash. Try beta AppImage for
>>>> Linux 64 bits :
>>>>
>>>
>> Thank you, I'll stick with digikam.
>>>
>>
>> You may not be aware that "AppImage" is not an image-management-"app",
>> but the
>> specific way in which the latest and freshest DigiKam is made available
>> in a
>> timely and consistent manner.
>>
>
> No, I'm not.
> I checked the info on AppImage. It sounds rather promising, but doesn't it
> leave part of the unix philosophy behind by bringing its own libs in one
> home directory, i.e. for each user one on one computer?
>
> cu
> Peter
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20161104/4abaa3c3/attachment.html>