.dtrash is empty and full?

[Peter Mc Donough]

Am 04.11.2016 um 23:40 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> You are right, but...
>
> 1/ It permit to run digiKam on Linux distro where it's not packaged.
> 2/ It permit to use the last stable version quickly.
> 3/ It permit to use version on development and to test last changes from
> developers, few hours are a patch applied to source code
> 4/ It permit to non developer users to use last code without to compile
> anything
> 5/ It permit to have a bundle of all dependencies required by digiKam
> packaged well as it must do for the application in goal to have something
> stable as it must.
> 6/ Windows and OSX use this bundle way to deploy applications, and it's
> work. Why not under Linux too...
> 7/ ... And more...

All true.
I have no problem with all of digikam installed as user in an linux 
environment as long as it doesn't require any libs installed as root.
In other words, no update or dependency hell like in Windows.

How does user-digikam access system provided monitor calibration?

cu
Peter