[Digikam-users] Digikam Color label and Photoshop urgency

[Christoph Siedentop]

Hi Gilles,

On 29 Aug 2013 22:40, "Gilles Caulier" <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, it's sound like xmp.xmp.label is just a descriptive text for
> xmp.photoshop.urgency
>
> I will set digiKam color label value to  xmp.photoshop.urgency by
default...
>
> Anybody as a feedback about this feature with Adobe LightRoom ?

I have lightroom available and can check. What exact test should be done?

Regards,
Christoph

>
> Note : I just look in Exiftool about this tag, and i can see this details
:
>
> xmp.photoshop.urgency : integer (should be in the range 1-8 to conform
> with the XMP spec)
> 0 = 0 (reserved)
> 1 = 1 (most urgent)
> 2 = 2
> 3 = 3
> 4 = 4
> 5 = 5 (normal urgency)
> 6 = 6
> 7 = 7
> 8 = 8 (least urgent)
> 9 = 9 (user-defined priority)
>
> ...where xmp.xmp.label is just a simple string.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2013/8/26 Photonoxx <photonoxx at free.fr>:
> > I just make a try.
> >
> > If I set xmp.photoshop.urgency tag with Digikam (with metadata tool),
the
> > set urgency is take in count by Capture NX 2, even if a previous color
label
> > was set in Capture NX 2.
> >
> > It seems xmp.photoshop.urgency have priority on xmp.xmp.label set by
Capture
> > NX 2 too, since when I set urgency in digikam, the new color label was
shown
> > in Capture NX but the original xmp.xmp.label still exist and is set to
the
> > old value...
> >
> >
> >
> > Le Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:08:30 +0200, Photonoxx <photonoxx at free.fr> a
écrit:
> >
> >
> >> Yes, I spoke about Xmp.photoshop.urgency which have just value from 1
to 9
> >> (0 value doesn't seems to exist).
> >>
> >> I think if Digikam write this tag, Capture should be able to read it
and
> >> display a color label.
> >>
> >> I'll try to set urgency in digikam (with kipi xmp editor) and see if
> >> Capture NX display a color tag or not...
> >>
> >> Le Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:05:15 +0200, Gilles Caulier
> >> <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> a écrit:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> No, this is not exactly the same values, if we follow color scheme :
> >>>
> >>> value    DK Color Label    Xmp.xmp.Label
> >>>   0         None                       None
> >>>   1         Red                        Red
> >>>   2         Orange                   Orange
> >>>   3         Yellow                    Yellow
> >>>   4         Green                     Green
> >>>   5         Blue                        Cyan
> >>>   6         Magenta                  Blue
> >>>   7         Gray                       Violet
> >>>   8         Black                      Magenta
> >>>   9         White                      Rose
> >>>
> >>> Gilles Caulier
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2013/8/24 Photonoxx <photonoxx at free.fr>:
> >>>>
> >>>> So I already do.
> >>>>
> >>>> photoshop Urgency tag (as used by Capture NX) have exactly the same
> >>>> value as
> >>>> digikam.colorlabel I guess.
> >>>>
> >>>> Instead of Xmp.digikam.colorlabel the tag is just
Xmp.photoshop.Urgency
> >>>> with
> >>>> a value starting at 1 to 9
> >>>>
> >>>> In my first post you can see the values.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tell me if I miss something.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Le Sat, 24 Aug 2013 18:55:21 +0200, Gilles Caulier
> >>>> <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> a écrit:
> >>>>
> >>>>> 2013/8/24 Photonoxx <photonoxx at free.fr>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks for the answer.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My will was not to see Capture NX xmp.label take in charge since
I'm
> >>>>>> totally
> >>>>>> agree with you about the absurdity to set tag entries in native
> >>>>>> language.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I most hoped it would be possible to take xmp.photoshop urgency in
> >>>>>> count.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, it's possible. I'm always favorable to improve
interoperability.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just give me the map for import Nik* Color Labels to DK. It will
take
> >>>>> 10 mns to code...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gilles Caulier
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Nicolas Boulesteix
> >>>> Photographe chasseur de lueurs
> >>>> http://www.photonoxx.fr
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Digikam-users mailing list
> >>> Digikam-users at kde.org
> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nicolas Boulesteix
> > Photographe chasseur de lueurs
> > http://www.photonoxx.fr
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-users mailing list
> > Digikam-users at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20130829/254b2673/attachment.html>