[Digikam-users] I am having issues in Edit

[Andreas Weigl]

Hi

beside, there are always beta releases before a final release.
Only thing is if nobody tests them then bugs wont be found.

I am certainly not the person for it but if there are some on the mailing
list who would like to test beta releases independent from Gilles, then the
major releases might have a better quality. Not that I say it is poor
quality but that prevent the use of a function, that is used a lot can be a
big minus for a software.

I think we all love digikam so if someone can set up a "digikam release
testers" group ... go for it.

Andy


On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Carl McGrath <cmcgrath5035 at comcast.net>wrote:

> Thanks for the update and all your efforts, Gilles.
>
> While I applaud  with Anders' intent, I would probably opt for what we
> have currently, incremental "production" releases with perhaps a few
> buglets.
> When something really goes poorly, one can easily(usually) back up to a
> prior "more acceptable" release.
> An issue I would have with "testing" releases would be that it almost
> requires a dedicated machine (or perhaps a dedicated VM) to test in
> parallel while running a "production" environment as well. Keeping releases
> isolated on the same machine is difficult(IMHO)
>
>
> On 08/14/2013 04:43 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
>> yes both have a problem.
>>
>> In fact in 3.2 a long time problem have been present in plugins init.
>>
>> In 3.3 i fixed some type of plugins, but i forget to check all others,
>> thinking that will be fine. My apologies.
>>
>> I review whole implementation relevant of all plugins init and removed
>> all time latencies and race conditions. I checked all on slow and
>> speed computers. All is fine now.
>>
>> Gilles Caulier
>>
>> 2013/8/14 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>>
>>> On Onsdag den 14. august 2013 22:35:09, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>
>>>> 3.4.0 is planed i september :
>>>>
>>> But will everything work? With 3.2, there was some issues, and there are
>>> also
>>> some with 3.3. Can we users help by testing up to the release?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  http://www.digikam.org/about/**releaseplan<http://www.digikam.org/about/releaseplan>
>>>>
>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>
>>>> 2013/8/14 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:2       2
>>>>
>>>
>>>  It appears to me that digikam seems to have issues in each release, that
>>>>> are already fixed for the next. Maybe a small beta or rc period would
>>>>> be
>>>>> nice?>
>>>>> On Onsdag den 14. august 2013 22:29:30, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> yes, and i already fixed this for 3.4.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/8/14 Carl McGrath <cmcgrath5035 at comcast.net>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have recently updated my openSUSE 12.3/KDE 4.10.5 machine to
>>>>>>> DigiKam
>>>>>>> 3.3.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I find that frequently the Edit-Enhance-Local Contrast tool hangs or
>>>>>>> fails
>>>>>>> to initialize.
>>>>>>> I see no progress in the lower left corner of the window.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Interestingly, Local Contrast runs fine on the same image using the
>>>>>>> Batch
>>>>>>> Queue Manager.
>>>>>>> And, I believe, it runs much faster.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any thoughts or similar results?
>>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/**listinfo/digikam-users<https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/**listinfo/digikam-users<https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anders
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/**listinfo/digikam-users<https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>
>>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/**listinfo/digikam-users<https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Anders
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/**listinfo/digikam-users<https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/**listinfo/digikam-users<https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/**listinfo/digikam-users<https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20130814/7e844262/attachment.html>