[Digikam-users] I am having issues in Edit

[Carl McGrath]

Thanks for the update and all your efforts, Gilles.

While I applaud  with Anders' intent, I would probably opt for what we 
have currently, incremental "production" releases with perhaps a few 
buglets.
When something really goes poorly, one can easily(usually) back up to a 
prior "more acceptable" release.
An issue I would have with "testing" releases would be that it almost 
requires a dedicated machine (or perhaps a dedicated VM) to test in 
parallel while running a "production" environment as well. Keeping 
releases isolated on the same machine is difficult(IMHO)

On 08/14/2013 04:43 PM, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> yes both have a problem.
>
> In fact in 3.2 a long time problem have been present in plugins init.
>
> In 3.3 i fixed some type of plugins, but i forget to check all others,
> thinking that will be fine. My apologies.
>
> I review whole implementation relevant of all plugins init and removed
> all time latencies and race conditions. I checked all on slow and
> speed computers. All is fine now.
>
> Gilles Caulier
>
> 2013/8/14 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:
>> On Onsdag den 14. august 2013 22:35:09, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>> 3.4.0 is planed i september :
>> But will everything work? With 3.2, there was some issues, and there are also
>> some with 3.3. Can we users help by testing up to the release?
>>
>>
>>
>>> http://www.digikam.org/about/releaseplan
>>>
>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>
>>> 2013/8/14 Anders Lund <anders at alweb.dk>:2       2
>>
>>>> It appears to me that digikam seems to have issues in each release, that
>>>> are already fixed for the next. Maybe a small beta or rc period would be
>>>> nice?>
>>>> On Onsdag den 14. august 2013 22:29:30, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>> yes, and i already fixed this for 3.4.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles Caulier
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/8/14 Carl McGrath <cmcgrath5035 at comcast.net>:
>>>>>> I have recently updated my openSUSE 12.3/KDE 4.10.5 machine to DigiKam
>>>>>> 3.3.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I find that frequently the Edit-Enhance-Local Contrast tool hangs or
>>>>>> fails
>>>>>> to initialize.
>>>>>> I see no progress in the lower left corner of the window.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interestingly, Local Contrast runs fine on the same image using the
>>>>>> Batch
>>>>>> Queue Manager.
>>>>>> And, I believe, it runs much faster.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any thoughts or similar results?
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>>> --
>>>> Anders
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-users mailing list
>>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>> --
>> Anders
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-users mailing list
>> Digikam-users at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>