[Digikam-users] (no subject)

[Rinus Bakker]

Hi Antonio,

I just try standard values, sometimes a second run can be done. If it
doesn't do what I want, I use curves instead. Changing values and trial and
error is to time consuming for me because I do not understand what I am
doing, which I do perfectly well using curves. But in 95% of cases I am
satisfied with local contrast.

2012/1/8 Antonio Trincone <antonio.trincone at gmail.com>

> Daer Users all
> I noticed that in this list most of the questions and threads are
> dedicated to informatic issues.
> I suppose many of us are also interested in digikam performance in
> photographic fields though and thus I decided to start with this message in
> order to exchange experience on the settings of many parts of the software
> to achieve proper result.
> After trials and errors this afternoon I set up some values for Local
> Contrast which seems to work best for at least one image on which I worked
> (work is still in progress of course).
>
> I have the italian translation of the software so sorry for some names
> that could be wrongly re-translated; however the four knobs are put at
> increasing Potency values of 2,00-4,00-8,00 and 16,00 using all common
> inferior values (Sfoca in italian) at 1,00.
>
> Well, how you use this Local contrast function of the software? Do you
> have your trials and errors values? Or have some different suggestion?
>
> I think this topic could be of interest together with PC problems but if
> for some reasons this kind of topic is out of the scope of the ML please
> let me know.
> Thanking in advance
>
> Antonio
>
> --
> --
> Antonio Trincone
> http://publicationslist.org/antonio.trincone
> http://www.icb.cnr.it/antonio.trincone/
> http://sites.google.com/site/phototrincone/
> http://sites.google.com/site/cvtrincone/home
> http://imaginesvolantscriptamanent.blogspot.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20120109/4a837017/attachment.html>