[Digikam-users] Re: Any interests in Digikam 2.0 packages and digikam PPA?
John Bestevaar
Josephus at people.net.au
Tue Mar 8 01:35:13 GMT 2011
OK Thanks for the explanation Phillip.
Cheers JohnB
On 08/03/11 11:02, Philip Johnsson wrote:
> Now it's done!
>
> I have now uploaded packages with Digikam 2.0. I built them from
> today's code from git so it will be Digikam 2.0 beta4 in development
> (as you will see in the "about Digikam" window). If you feel
> experimental and want to go with more cutting edge code then you find
> the packages in my "kubuntu-backports" PPA. The main packages are
> called digikam2, showfoto2 and kipi-plugins2. That way you won't
> automatically get them updated if you prefer to still use the stable
> 1.9 release.You can't run them both at the same time on the same
> system as they will conflict. If you want to play safe then backup
> your Digikam settings and other stuff before you play around with the
> latest.
>
> It all should just work but if you have any problems installing the
> packages then let me know.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> /Philip
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Philip Johnsson
> <philip.johnsson at gmail.com <mailto:philip.johnsson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I'm afraid that Digikam 1.2 was the last version that could build
> on Lucid as Digikam is rather heavily dependent on recent KDE
> frameworks, even if you run Digikam from KDE or not. Lucid comes
> with KDE 4.4.5*(in lucid-updates) *and from Digikam 1.3 you have
> needed at least KDE 4.5 to build it. Digikam 2.0 will need atleast
> KDE 4.6 to build. So it's not just laziness or disinterest that
> there is no newer updates for Lucid.
>
> I can just say that you need to upgrade to more recent versions of
> Ubuntu if you want new versions of Digikam. :(
>
> /Philip
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:01 AM, John Bestevaar
> <Josephus at people.net.au <mailto:Josephus at people.net.au>> wrote:
>
> Hi Phillip
> As an ordinary non programmer user of DigiKam 1.2 on Ubuntu
> 10.04, i am too scared to go to Ubuntu 10.10 because it is not
> a LTS version. On the other hand i don't have the skill needed
> to compile a more up to date version of Digikam for myself for
> Ubuntu 10.04. I checked your very impressive PPA on launchpad
> but did not see any Digikam package for Lucid Lynx.
> Regards John Bestevaar
>
>
> On 07/03/11 04:28, Photonoxx wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested too. No matter about which way to do. I
> already use extra
> and Kubuntu-backports PPA, so if you integrate Digikam 2.0
> b3 in one of
> them, it's ok for me.
>
> I use your PPA since Lucid I think (may be Intrepid, I
> don't exactly
> remember), and I fully appreciate it cause it integrate
> the Digikam
> installation in Synaptic packet manager (which is not so
> easy for me by
> building Digikam my self as I don't know how to make deb
> easily).
>
> So thanks for that !
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicolas
>
> Le Sun, 06 Mar 2011 18:36:17 +0100, Philip Johnsson
> <philip.johnsson at gmail.com
> <mailto:philip.johnsson at gmail.com>> a écrit:
>
> Hi all
>
> I think it's know to this list that I have Digikam 1.9
> packages on my PPA
> for Ubuntu 10.10 but I have no idea on how may people
> use it or what the
> interest is, beside some people now and then get in
> touch with me about
> this
> and that with packages.
>
> I just started to build packages of Digikam 2.0 beta3
> for myself and
> wondered about what the interest in them are for you
> guys? They are made
> as
> digikam2 packages so they won't automatically update
> if you prefer to use
> the stable Digikam 1.9 but will conflict if you try to
> install them both
> at
> the same time. I might upload them to my
> kubuntu-backports PPA as you
> will
> need stuff from KDE 4.6 to build.
>
> Second question is if you guys would prefer a separate
> digikam PPA with
> just
> digikam stuff instead of as it is now to use my
> "extra" and for exiv2
> 0.21.x
> support my kubuntu-backports PPA? For me it's easier
> to do as I'm doing
> now
> and upload my stuff to the "extra" PPA but I don't
> know how many of you
> don't want to use it because it includes a bunch of
> assorted updates that
> you want to leave as they are.
>
> Feedback on this from anyone who cares are appreciated.
>
> Happy digikaming!
>
> Regards,
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org <mailto:Digikam-users at kde.org>
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20110308/acf5a5af/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Josephus.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 209 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20110308/acf5a5af/attachment.vcf>
More information about the Digikam-users
mailing list