[Digikam-users] Storing tags in Akonadi?

[Gilles Caulier]

Dotan,

Well, i'm already confused by nepomuk integration...

Now, there is akonady... it's a big puzzle. It's sound like the good
metadata framework used under linux desktop is not yet defined.

I'm not a specilist of Nepomuk/Akonady. But sound like there are duplicates
features here.

We need a better feedback before to use something like that in digiKam.

Also, there will be no plan to replace digiKam database by an external and
untested framework. Marcel has developed a new and powerfull  database
interface, and we working to stabilize this code, no more for the moment...

Best

Gilles Caulier

2008/9/4 Dotan Cohen <dotancohen at gmail.com>

> After 0.10 is out the door, would it be wise to consider storing tags
> in Akonadi? If the tags were stored in Akonadi, then they could
> integrate with Kontact, no? An example usage would be that I am
> looking at pictures of Kristina in Digikam, and I want to email her.
> Or, I am in Kontact looking at Paul's data, and I pull up pictures of
> him. This might also help lead to integration between Digikam and
> other KDE photo applications, such as KPhotoAlbum. As Akonadi is not
> KDE-specific, even F-Spot could then adopt Akonadi integration.
>
> Let me know everyone's thoughts on the matter. Thanks!
>
> --
> Dotan Cohen
>
> http://what-is-what.com
> http://gibberish.co.il
> א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת
>
> ä-ö-ü-ß-Ä-Ö-Ü
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-users mailing list
> Digikam-users at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20080904/90318d5b/attachment.html>