[Digikam-users] Digikam IPTC

Gerhard Kulzer gerhardkgmx at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 12:12:18 GMT 2008


On Tuesday 19 February 2008 michael hughes wrote:
> Interesting to receive the second email. It seems I was right when I
> suggested that I would not be making myself popular! Looks very much like
> that the people who are developing digikam don't like outsiders who don't
> speak linux and merely want a programme to do a job. That criticism produces
> such an allergic reaction makes me wonder. To put forward the argument that
> one is doing it in ones free time and is not paid does not seem to me to be
> particularly coherent. Either you do it because you want to or you do it to
> get paid, there is no excuse for doing anything badly or, more to the point,
> expecting to avoid crticism.
> 
> In fact there is a very constructive point to this "debate". Unfortunately
> you do not appear to be able to perceive it.
> 
> 
> Michael Hughes
 
Your problem seems to be that you like trouble or like to make trouble, that is not the same as critique. Critique has to based on facts. We thrive on this, actually FOSS is based on critique as its main element. Our attitude is we like solving problems.

So my advice to you is : stop trolling.  Maybe you're to young, and if not, you should see a therapist (I grant you that most of them are bad, but if you really want to change, you'll find a good one).

Good bye (or I should rather say 'Good buy Lightone')

Gerhard
> 
> On 18/02/2008, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2008/2/18, michael hughes <leftbrainorama at googlemail.com>:
> > >
> > > Thankyou for the links: I had of course read all that and it is now
> > > evident that in Digikam it is not possible to write captions into the IPTC.
> > > My point is proved; Lightzone is a more mature product as it can do this and
> > > handle TIFFS.
> >
> >
> > Before to said than digiKam is less mature than a proprietary program,
> > just try to use it in the right way and compare what is possible to do.
> >
> > - digiKam support IPTC and of course can store caption in IPTC tags !
> > - You can set IPTC caption in batch mode if you want.
> > - LightZone is a comercial program. LightZone team is payed for that.
> > digiKam team is an open source program. We don't recieve money for that,
> > excepted donation of course. We working on this project on available free
> > time...
> > - Light zone is not digiKam. The features are not the same !
> >
> > Thanks for your very contructive remarks...
> >
> > Gilles Caulier
> >
> >
> 
> 



-- 
><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·... ><((((º> ¸.·´¯`·...¸ ><((((º>
http://www.gerhard.fr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/attachments/20080219/4a872199/attachment.sig>


More information about the Digikam-users mailing list