[Digikam-users] problems with ICC profiles

[Gerhard Kulzer]

On Friday 19 May 2006 18:32, Daniel Bauer wrote:
> Am Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 16:48 schrieb Gilles Caulier:
> > On Friday 19 May 2006 03:08 pm, Daniel Bauer wrote:
> > > Can you tell me what settings you entered in digikam (in raw image
> > > decoding options and ICC settings), please?
> >
> > Screenshots sent in private, images (c) from Daniel (:=)))...
> >
> > Gilles
>
> As already said in PM: thank you very much, Gilles!
>
> I achieved the same result in 0.9.0 svn. It is not bad, but it is not
> perfect yet ;-)  but at least a great step ahead :-)
>
> I have put samples of this pictures here:
>
> 1) photo as the canon-program on Win98 made it without any corrections
> (then saved as 16bit-TIFF and resized and saved as jpg with photoshop 5.0):
> http://www.daniel-bauer.com/test/6057_09_canon.jpg
>
> 2) same picture in 0.9.0 svn with setting as shown by you (resized and
> saved as jpg within digikam 0.9.0):
> http://www.daniel-bauer.com/test/6057_009_editor.jpg
>
> 3) same, then with "automatic color correction" by digikam:
> http://www.daniel-bauer.com/test/6057_009_automatic.jpg
>
> I think, the "canon" ist the most "vivid" one. What do you think?
>
> Daniel
>
Well IMHO 3) is the best. Ts shows the most nuances/depths, look at the 
wrinkles in the sheets, its has the best 3D effect and clarity to me. I'm 
less certain about the hue, only the one who knows the source can judge..

Gerhard