[Digikam-devel] Re: face detection process...

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Thu Jan 6 08:15:07 GMT 2011


2011/1/6 Amey Dharwadker <ameydhar at gmail.com>

> Yes 128 out of 1660 is bad.


No. A lots of my photos do not have face, and there is a lots of duplicates
files. It's a test collection on a test computer.

My real photo collections is very huge compared and is hosted on a removable
media. I will try to process it soon to compare and test.

Gilles Caulier.



> Is the algorithm used in the program in
> 0.2 branch different? Just asking as I have not checked it out yet.
>
> Amey Dharwadker
>
> On 1/6/11, Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Oh dear. I was excited at first, but wow 128 of 1660 thats terrible. I
> have
> > another copy in 0.2 branch that I think works a lot better. Will add
> false
> > positives I think. Also there was a change I had to make to fix a memory
> > leak which will break kface build I think I haven't tested that yet.
> >
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > On 5 Jan 2011, at 21:56, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >
> >> AVI: 4
> >> JP2k: 11
> >> JPG: 1204
> >> MOV: 1
> >> MP3: 3
> >> MP4: 2
> >> MPEG: 2
> >> PGF: 1
> >> PNG: 186
> >> PPM: 3
> >> RAW-ARW: 27
> >> RAW-CR2: 17
> >> RAW-CRW: 6
> >> RAW-DCR: 2
> >> RAW-DNG: 62
> >> RAW-HDR: 1
> >> RAW-MRW: 29
> >> RAW-NEF: 16
> >> RAW-ORF: 2
> >> RAW-PEF: 7
> >> RAW-RAF: 9
> >> RAW-RAW: 1
> >> RAW-X3F: 2
> >> TIFF: 50
> >> XCF: 12
> >> Total Items: 1660
> >>
> >> Gilles
> >>
> >> 2011/1/5 Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com>
> >> How many pictures you have? I just wanted to check because when I run
> >> detection its not very good. So 128 faces out of how many possible ones,
> >> roughly?
> >>
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> On 5 Jan 2011, at 08:48, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>
> >>> As i said previously, it take 37 mns around to scan all my
> collections...
> >>>
> >>> Gilles
> >>>
> >>> 2011/1/5 Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com>
> >>> Oh wow, I am genuinely surprised and happy that only 5 out of 133 are
> >>> false positives. What about the time it took to do the scans? I mean
> did
> >>> it even matter?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>> On 5 Jan 2011, at 07:31, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yes
> >>>>
> >>>> Gilles
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/1/4 Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com>
> >>>> Just to clarify 128 are faces and 5 are not is that right? :)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 4 Jan 2011, at 10:17, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just few words about face detection process using current svn
> >>>>> implementation :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - digiKam compiled and installed on a new computer.
> >>>>> - Dabatase created from scratch.
> >>>>> - duration 35 mn (PIV DC 3.6 Ghz, 2Gb RAM) for these stats :
> >>>>>
> >>>>> digiKam version 2.0.0-beta1 (rev.: 1211276)
> >>>>> AVI: 4
> >>>>> JP2k: 11
> >>>>> JPG: 1204
> >>>>> MOV: 1
> >>>>> MP3: 3
> >>>>> MP4: 2
> >>>>> MPEG: 2
> >>>>> PGF: 1
> >>>>> PNG: 186
> >>>>> PPM: 3
> >>>>> RAW-ARW: 27
> >>>>> RAW-CR2: 17
> >>>>> RAW-CRW: 6
> >>>>> RAW-DCR: 2
> >>>>> RAW-DNG: 62
> >>>>> RAW-HDR: 1
> >>>>> RAW-MRW: 29
> >>>>> RAW-NEF: 16
> >>>>> RAW-ORF: 2
> >>>>> RAW-PEF: 7
> >>>>> RAW-RAF: 9
> >>>>> RAW-RAW: 1
> >>>>> RAW-X3F: 2
> >>>>> TIFF: 50
> >>>>> XCF: 12
> >>>>> Total Items: 1660
> >>>>> :
> >>>>> Albums: 106
> >>>>> Tags: 165
> >>>>> :
> >>>>> Database backend: QSQLITE
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - 133 unknown items found.
> >>>>> - 5 items are not faces. All others are fine.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bugs :
> >>>>> - when scan is complete, progress bar continue to move...
> >>>>> - There is an album displayed as Unknown where there is no item. Why
> ?
> >>>>> Look screenshot for details. in fact, it's an icon view problem at
> >>>>> scrolling. Moving contents with mouse wheel change icon view.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5322873069
> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5322873101
> >>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5323478176
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gilles
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >>>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>>>
> >>>> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would
> it?
> >>>> -- Albert Einstein
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>>
> >>> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would
> it?
> >>> -- Albert Einstein
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>
> >> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?
> >> -- Albert Einstein
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Digikam-devel mailing list
> >> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >
> > If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?
> > -- Albert Einstein
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Amey Dharwadker
> Final Year Undergraduate,
> Electronics and Communication Engineering,
> NIT Trichy
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20110106/1c0cb7d2/attachment.html>


More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list