[Digikam-devel] Re: face detection process...

[Amey Dharwadker]

Yes 128 out of 1660 is bad. Is the algorithm used in the program in
0.2 branch different? Just asking as I have not checked it out yet.

Amey Dharwadker

On 1/6/11, Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh dear. I was excited at first, but wow 128 of 1660 thats terrible. I have
> another copy in 0.2 branch that I think works a lot better. Will add false
> positives I think. Also there was a change I had to make to fix a memory
> leak which will break kface build I think I haven't tested that yet.
>
>
> Alex
>
> On 5 Jan 2011, at 21:56, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
>> AVI: 4
>> JP2k: 11
>> JPG: 1204
>> MOV: 1
>> MP3: 3
>> MP4: 2
>> MPEG: 2
>> PGF: 1
>> PNG: 186
>> PPM: 3
>> RAW-ARW: 27
>> RAW-CR2: 17
>> RAW-CRW: 6
>> RAW-DCR: 2
>> RAW-DNG: 62
>> RAW-HDR: 1
>> RAW-MRW: 29
>> RAW-NEF: 16
>> RAW-ORF: 2
>> RAW-PEF: 7
>> RAW-RAF: 9
>> RAW-RAW: 1
>> RAW-X3F: 2
>> TIFF: 50
>> XCF: 12
>> Total Items: 1660
>>
>> Gilles
>>
>> 2011/1/5 Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com>
>> How many pictures you have? I just wanted to check because when I run
>> detection its not very good. So 128 faces out of how many possible ones,
>> roughly?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On 5 Jan 2011, at 08:48, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>
>>> As i said previously, it take 37 mns around to scan all my collections...
>>>
>>> Gilles
>>>
>>> 2011/1/5 Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com>
>>> Oh wow, I am genuinely surprised and happy that only 5 out of 133 are
>>> false positives. What about the time it took to do the scans? I mean did
>>> it even matter?
>>>
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On 5 Jan 2011, at 07:31, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes
>>>>
>>>> Gilles
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/4 Alex Jironkin <alexjironkin at gmail.com>
>>>> Just to clarify 128 are faces and 5 are not is that right? :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On 4 Jan 2011, at 10:17, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Just few words about face detection process using current svn
>>>>> implementation :
>>>>>
>>>>> - digiKam compiled and installed on a new computer.
>>>>> - Dabatase created from scratch.
>>>>> - duration 35 mn (PIV DC 3.6 Ghz, 2Gb RAM) for these stats :
>>>>>
>>>>> digiKam version 2.0.0-beta1 (rev.: 1211276)
>>>>> AVI: 4
>>>>> JP2k: 11
>>>>> JPG: 1204
>>>>> MOV: 1
>>>>> MP3: 3
>>>>> MP4: 2
>>>>> MPEG: 2
>>>>> PGF: 1
>>>>> PNG: 186
>>>>> PPM: 3
>>>>> RAW-ARW: 27
>>>>> RAW-CR2: 17
>>>>> RAW-CRW: 6
>>>>> RAW-DCR: 2
>>>>> RAW-DNG: 62
>>>>> RAW-HDR: 1
>>>>> RAW-MRW: 29
>>>>> RAW-NEF: 16
>>>>> RAW-ORF: 2
>>>>> RAW-PEF: 7
>>>>> RAW-RAF: 9
>>>>> RAW-RAW: 1
>>>>> RAW-X3F: 2
>>>>> TIFF: 50
>>>>> XCF: 12
>>>>> Total Items: 1660
>>>>> :
>>>>> Albums: 106
>>>>> Tags: 165
>>>>> :
>>>>> Database backend: QSQLITE
>>>>>
>>>>> - 133 unknown items found.
>>>>> - 5 items are not faces. All others are fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bugs :
>>>>> - when scan is complete, progress bar continue to move...
>>>>> - There is an album displayed as Unknown where there is no item. Why ?
>>>>> Look screenshot for details. in fact, it's an icon view problem at
>>>>> scrolling. Moving contents with mouse wheel change icon view.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5322873069
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5322873101
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/digikam/5323478176
>>>>>
>>>>> Gilles
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>>
>>>> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?
>>>> -- Albert Einstein
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>
>>> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?
>>> -- Albert Einstein
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>
>> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?
>> -- Albert Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digikam-devel mailing list
>> Digikam-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
> If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?
> -- Albert Einstein
>
>
>
>


-- 
Amey Dharwadker
Final Year Undergraduate,
Electronics and Communication Engineering,
NIT Trichy