[Digikam-devel] Storage of digiKam Tags path (again)...

Gilles Caulier caulier.gilles at gmail.com
Sun Mar 11 16:18:03 GMT 2007


Ok. when you said IOP, you want mean Exif.Interoperability. Right ?

Gilles

2007/3/11, Andreas Huggel <ahuggel at gmx.net>:
>
> On Sunday 11 March 2007 01:56, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would to talk again about digiKam tags path to store in Metadata...
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > I propose to drive this Exif tags to be compatible with M$ photo
> > manager and ... to add a new private Exif.Image tag to store all
> > digiKam Tags path of an image using UTF8 (or UCS2 i cannot see the
> > real advantage). Why not to use the tag 0x9cff witch is not yet used.
> > Look the ExifTool tag database :
> >
> > http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html
> >
> > What do you thing about ?
> >
> > Andreas, there is no risk to do it ?
>
> The only risk I can see is that sooner or later someone else may use the
> same tags for something else. I suggest you use tags in the Exif, GPS
> or IOP directory, not in IFD0 or IFD1 to limit conflicts to the Exif
> standard only.
>
> -ahu.
> _______________________________________________
> Digikam-devel mailing list
> Digikam-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20070311/0c82f0d5/attachment.html>


More information about the Digikam-devel mailing list