[Digikam-devel] Storage of digiKam Tags path (again)...

[Gilles Caulier]

Andreas,

if you talking about Interroperability directory, witch tag number you
recommend to use ?

In Exiftool database, i can see 5 tags :

0x0001, 0x0002, 0x1000, 0x1001, and 0x1002.

Gilles

2007/3/11, Gilles Caulier <caulier.gilles at gmail.com>:
>
> Ok. when you said IOP, you want mean Exif.Interoperability. Right ?
>
> Gilles
>
> 2007/3/11, Andreas Huggel <ahuggel at gmx.net>:
> >
> > On Sunday 11 March 2007 01:56, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I would to talk again about digiKam tags path to store in Metadata...
> > >
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > I propose to drive this Exif tags to be compatible with M$ photo
> > > manager and ... to add a new private Exif.Image tag to store all
> > > digiKam Tags path of an image using UTF8 (or UCS2 i cannot see the
> > > real advantage). Why not to use the tag 0x9cff witch is not yet used.
> > > Look the ExifTool tag database :
> > >
> > > http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html<http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/%7Ephil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html>
> > >
> > > What do you thing about ?
> > >
> > > Andreas, there is no risk to do it ?
> >
> > The only risk I can see is that sooner or later someone else may use the
> > same tags for something else. I suggest you use tags in the Exif, GPS
> > or IOP directory, not in IFD0 or IFD1 to limit conflicts to the Exif
> > standard only.
> >
> > -ahu.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Digikam-devel mailing list
> > Digikam-devel at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digikam-devel
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20070311/5dfdba37/attachment.html>