[Digikam-devel] Future plans : 0.9.2-final and KDE4 port...

[Gilles Caulier]

2007/6/12, Arnd Baecker <arnd.baecker at web.de>:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Gilles Caulier wrote:
>
> > 2007/6/12, Arnd Baecker <arnd.baecker at web.de>:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> > >
> > > > DIGIKAM 0.9.3 RELEASE:
> > > > ------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > The future KDE3 digiKam release will be a bugfix release. No new
> > > features
> > > > will be added. The code will still into
> > > > branches/extragear/kde3/graphics/digikam.
> > >
> > > Hmm, this would mean, that nothing new
> > > (no wishes from the B.K.O. etc.) can be added until
> > > the KDE4 port of digikam is operational (Sept 2007)?
> > >
> > > ((I understand the reasoning behind it, but it might also
> > > block people from contributing ...))
> >
> >
> > Well, if new features are added to KDE3 branches, it must be backported
> to
> > KDE4 too. Do you understand the problem : it's a double job witch can
> > introduce bugs (:=)))
>
> I perfectly understand - and it is more work.
>
> > This can be done for small features of course, easily backportable
> between
> > branches...
>
> Alright.
>
> Should one try to get as many bugs fixed before the KDE4 branch
> gets active?
>
> For example, there are a couple of B.K.O. entries (27 in total)
> which appear to contain a patch.
> Should I have a look at all of them and report if I think it is
> worth that an expert has a look?
>

Yes, you can do it. You can short these entries by vote...

Gilles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20070612/50be29e0/attachment.html>