[Digikam-devel] 0.9.0-beta3: test packages released

[F.J.Cruz]

El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 22:11, Oliver Dörr escribió:
> F.J.Cruz wrote:
> > El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió:
> >> F.J.Cruz wrote:
> >>> El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió:
> >>>>> BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no longer
> >>>>> translated after this test. These are
> >>>>> Hot Pixel Correction
> >>>>> Refocus
> >>>>> The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files were
> >>>>> not modified in the last two months. It looks like the tarball does
> >>>>> not include all files.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are
> >>>> inside SVN, but not inside the tarball.
> >>>>
> >>>> Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language using
> >>>>
> >>>> ls digikam*po |wc -l
> >>>>
> >>>> and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be 30,
> >>>> if everything is translated. I found non of the two files inside the
> >>>> tarball.
> >>>>
> >>>> Oliver
> >>>
> >>> This is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some languages
> >>> weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the repository and
> >>> I updated my local copy just before I begin to prepare the release. I
> >>> sent a message to ML but nobody answered it. I don't know what is the
> >>> problem.
> >>
> >> Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is
> >> inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a
> >> problem with the svn up...
> >>
> >> Oliver
> >
> > I forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of the
> > beta3 version until this problem is solved, right?
>
>  From my point of view this would be a good idea. The bug in the scripts
> should be fixed for the release candidates.
>
> @Gilles: What do you think? Are two untranslated plugins a showstopper
> for beta 3? (I think it's your decision)
>
> @Paco: Could you look for the problem inside the scripts? If not, what
> is needed to create a package/tarball, so that somebody else could hunt
> the bug.
>
> Oliver

I'm not familiarized with Ruby, but I'm working on it and doing some changes, 
when I've get some results, I'll send a post.

Paco.