[Digikam-devel] 0.9.0-beta3: test packages released

[Oliver Dörr]

F.J.Cruz wrote:
> El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 22:11, Oliver Dörr escribió:
>   
>> F.J.Cruz wrote:
>>     
>>> El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió:
>>>       
>>>> F.J.Cruz wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió:
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no longer
>>>>>>> translated after this test. These are
>>>>>>> Hot Pixel Correction
>>>>>>> Refocus
>>>>>>> The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files were
>>>>>>> not modified in the last two months. It looks like the tarball does
>>>>>>> not include all files.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are
>>>>>> inside SVN, but not inside the tarball.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language using
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ls digikam*po |wc -l
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be 30,
>>>>>> if everything is translated. I found non of the two files inside the
>>>>>> tarball.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oliver
>>>>>>             
>>>>> This is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some languages
>>>>> weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the repository and
>>>>> I updated my local copy just before I begin to prepare the release. I
>>>>> sent a message to ML but nobody answered it. I don't know what is the
>>>>> problem.
>>>>>           
>>>> Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is
>>>> inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a
>>>> problem with the svn up...
>>>>
>>>> Oliver
>>>>         
>>> I forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of the
>>> beta3 version until this problem is solved, right?
>>>       
>>  From my point of view this would be a good idea. The bug in the scripts
>> should be fixed for the release candidates.
>>
>> @Gilles: What do you think? Are two untranslated plugins a showstopper
>> for beta 3? (I think it's your decision)
>>
>> @Paco: Could you look for the problem inside the scripts? If not, what
>> is needed to create a package/tarball, so that somebody else could hunt
>> the bug.
>>
>> Oliver
>>     
>
> I'm not familiarized with Ruby, but I'm working on it and doing some changes, 
> when I've get some results, I'll send a post.
>   
Ok,

thank you very much
Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20061018/3fb1cef7/attachment.html>