[Digikam-devel] 0.9.0-beta3: test packages released

[Oliver Dörr]

F.J.Cruz wrote:
> El Miércoles, 18 de Octubre de 2006 17:04, Oliver Dörr escribió:
>   
>> F.J.Cruz wrote:
>>     
>>> El Martes, 17 de Octubre de 2006 23:44, Oliver Dörr escribió:
>>>       
>>>>> BUT there is a problem with the tarball. Some plugins are no longer
>>>>> translated after this test. These are
>>>>> Hot Pixel Correction
>>>>> Refocus
>>>>> The files are inside SVN, but not inside the tarball. Both files were
>>>>> not modified in the last two months. It looks like the tarball does
>>>>> not include all files.
>>>>>           
>>>> Just checked the france translation. Same problem. The files are inside
>>>> SVN, but not inside the tarball.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally i checked the number of po files for each language using
>>>>
>>>> ls digikam*po |wc -l
>>>>
>>>> and got a max of 28 files inside the plugins tarball. It should be 30,
>>>> if everything is translated. I found non of the two files inside the
>>>> tarball.
>>>>
>>>> Oliver
>>>>         
>>> This is the same problem I had with the beta2 release. Some languages
>>> weren't included in tarballs, althought they are in the repository and I
>>> updated my local copy just before I begin to prepare the release. I sent
>>> a message to ML but nobody answered it. I don't know what is the problem.
>>>       
>> Are the files included in your local copy? If so, than the problem is
>> inside the scripts that prepare the tarball. If not, than you have a
>> problem with the svn up...
>>
>> Oliver
>>     
>
> I forgot to say that I think i have to delay the official release of the beta3 
> version until this problem is solved, right?
>   
 From my point of view this would be a good idea. The bug in the scripts 
should be fixed for the release candidates.

@Gilles: What do you think? Are two untranslated plugins a showstopper 
for beta 3? (I think it's your decision)

@Paco: Could you look for the problem inside the scripts? If not, what 
is needed to create a package/tarball, so that somebody else could hunt 
the bug.

Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-devel/attachments/20061018/b2b771a9/attachment.html>