Issue of 25th May is online

danny at commit-digest.org danny at commit-digest.org
Wed Nov 5 11:59:52 UTC 2014


Hi Alex,
1) Networking Tools seems like a good place for kdeconnect.
2) Frameworks seem like they should go in kdebase (though maybe check a previous issue to see how they were classified there)

(for any of these, feel free to set up an automated filter for future use! http://enzyme.commit-digest.org/tools/commit-area-filtering/)

3) I often put porting commits in "other" (though I usually go back and remove porting commits that aren't "significant")

Many thanks,
Danny


-----Original Message-----
From: digest-bounces at kde.org [mailto:digest-bounces at kde.org] On Behalf Of Alex Fikl
Sent: 01 November 2014 08:53
To: List for co-ordinating production of the KDE Commit-Digest.
Subject: Re: Issue of 25th May is online

Hey guys,

Thanks a lot! Everything seems to be working correctly.

I have a few question about the classifications (this is slightly more complicated apparently :)
* I came across kdeconnect and it doesn't have a default category.
Where should it go? Networking Tools maybe?
* Same for all the frameworks. Should they go in KDE Base?
* With all the frameworks work, there are a lot of porting commits (probably my fault). Which type should they have?

Alex

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Danny Allen <danny at commit-digest.org> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> As Marta says, you should now be able to see the “Classify” page in your Enzyme account.
> Ignore the email you may have received about a declined application, I rejected the new user account application as you can do it using your existing account.
>
> Anything else, please feel free to ask!
>
> Thanks,
> Danny
>
>
>> On 28 Oct 2014, at 19:09, Alex Fikl <alexfikl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've been mostly doing reviewing until now (more or less 
>> successfully), but I'd like to help with the classifying as well. Is 
>> there anything else that needs to be done except applying for it?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:49 PM,  <danny at commit-digest.org> wrote:
>>> If I can start to clear the backlog of commits that need classifying, would either Marta or someone else be able to complete the editing part and get some issues published?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Danny
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: marta at rybczynska.net [mailto:marta at rybczynska.net]
>>> Sent: 26 October 2014 19:28
>>> To: danny at commit-digest.org
>>> Cc: 'List for co-ordinating production of the KDE Commit-Digest.'
>>> Subject: Re: Issue of 25th May is online
>>>
>>> Hello Danny & all,
>>> I'm quite busy at the moment with eV stuff and other things, but I'm trying to slowly resume the editing part.
>>>
>>> But.. The review part is working great (thanks to Aleix and 
>>> Giacomo), but it blocks at classification. Currently when I want to release an issue I have to do both classification and editing.
>>> The thing with classification is that it has become more complicated - there are quite many subrepositories that are not put automatically in a category, so you need to basically look around. As a result, it becomes 1h at least per issue. If we can find someone to do the job and/or add some more automation, it should work much more smoothly.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Marta
>>>
>>> Cytowanie danny at commit-digest.org:
>>>
>>>> Hi Marta, all,
>>>>
>>>> I see that the last Commit-Digest to be published was several months ago.
>>>>
>>>> I understand the “Digest burnout” that can happen – after all, it 
>>>> happened to me!
>>>>
>>>> Which is why I created the Enzyme platform so that the production 
>>>> could become distributed – however, it has been clear for a long 
>>>> time that much of the work for getting the Digest finished up and 
>>>> published each week has been done by Marta, which is great when she 
>>>> is able to do it, but is a single point of failure in the case when 
>>>> she is not able to.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do we need to find some new people to help out with the Digest?
>>>>
>>>> @Marta: do we need a new “editor in chief”, or are you able to 
>>>> resume this role?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks for everyone’s work over the past years, it is much appreciated!
>>>>
>>>> Danny
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: digest-bounces at kde.org [mailto:digest-bounces at kde.org] On 
>>>> Behalf Of Marta Rybczynska
>>>> Sent: 24 August 2014 18:31
>>>> To: digest at kde.org
>>>> Subject: Issue of 25th May is online
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello all,
>>>> Next KDE Commit Digest is online. It includes:
>>>> * Amarok implements popular demand to restore scroll location when 
>>>> collection filter is cleared; adds a new option to support 
>>>> icon-view large thumb size (over 256x256 px).
>>>> * Plasma desktop streamlines Comment fields of KCMs by applying 
>>>> common language and type-setting to the systemsettings modules in 
>>>> kde-workspace.
>>>> * Kopete adds support for SOCKS5 proxy in ICQ protocol.
>>>> * Umbrello sees work on UML 2.0.
>>>> * Krita adds the indexed color filter. Porting to KF5/Qt5 
>>>> continues, including massif-visualizer and partitionmanager.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Marta
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Digest mailing list
>>> Digest at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>> _______________________________________________
>> Digest mailing list
>> Digest at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
_______________________________________________
Digest mailing list
Digest at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest



More information about the Digest mailing list