Article on KexiDB - dates are mixed?

Danny Allen danny at
Thu Jan 6 10:18:23 CET 2011

Yeah, a "notes" feature is on the todo list :)

For the actual article, perhaps he means the original library was written in 2003?
Feel free to introduce yourself to Jaroslaw @ kexipl at and ask for clarification.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladislav Blanton" <vblanton at>
To: digest at
Sent: Thursday, 6 January, 2011 3:17:59 AM
Subject: Article on KexiDB - dates are mixed?

Hello Danny and team, 

Nice implement of "Pending Feature Articles". 
Going through and doing a proofreading was good and straightforward, but it would be nice to be able to leave a comment for the original Editor and/or other proofreaders. 

Comment: The dates seem to mixed up in the "History" section of the KexiDB article. First the idea for a new abstraction layer was thought of in 2004 and then later it says that the code began in 2003.. huh? time travel? 


Digest mailing list
Digest at

More information about the Digest mailing list