Article on KexiDB - dates are mixed?

[Danny Allen]

Yeah, a "notes" feature is on the todo list :)

For the actual article, perhaps he means the original library was written in 2003?
Feel free to introduce yourself to Jaroslaw @ kexipl at gmail.com and ask for clarification.

Cheers,
Danny


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladislav Blanton" <vblanton at gmail.com>
To: digest at kde.org
Sent: Thursday, 6 January, 2011 3:17:59 AM
Subject: Article on KexiDB - dates are mixed?


Hello Danny and team, 

Nice implement of "Pending Feature Articles". 
Going through and doing a proofreading was good and straightforward, but it would be nice to be able to leave a comment for the original Editor and/or other proofreaders. 

Comment: The dates seem to mixed up in the "History" section of the KexiDB article. First the idea for a new abstraction layer was thought of in 2004 and then later it says that the code began in 2003.. huh? time travel? 

V 

_______________________________________________
Digest mailing list
Digest at kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest