Article on KexiDB - dates are mixed?

[Vladislav Blanton]

Hello Danny and team,

Nice implement of "Pending Feature Articles".
Going through and doing a proofreading was good and straightforward, but it
would be nice to be able to leave a comment for the original Editor and/or
other proofreaders.

Comment: The dates seem to mixed up in the "History" section of the KexiDB
article. First the idea for a new abstraction layer was thought of in 2004
and then later it says that the code began in 2003.. huh? time travel?

V
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digest/attachments/20110105/53d9c696/attachment.htm