specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?

[Roger Pixley]

With respect Danny the things we are discussing on the Community Wiki are
really KDE specific I don't think what is a relevant commit is easily
translateable to any other project. Enzyme things should certainly be on the
Enzyme wiki but so far nothing we have spoken about is much use to anyone
but someone interested in KDE.

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Danny Allen <danny at commit-digest.org>wrote:

> Hi all,
> I don't mind if we use http://community.kde.org or any other wiki to
> develop guidelines in, but i'd like to transfer any "finalised" content to
> https://github.com/dannyakakong/Enzyme/wiki for two reasons:
>
> * Enzyme should remain project-independent (even though the main - and only
> so far - user is KDE)
> * I've built nice integration of the wiki pages straight into Enzyme, and I
> don't want to create another system at this time
>
> But anyway, good work guys! (i'll add my own thoughts to the wiki soon too)
>
> The EtherPad thing isn't as easy to get setup on, but KDE does have an
> install running at http://notes-dev.kde.org/ (not that i'm advocating
> using it :))
>
> Cheers,
> Danny
>
>
> > > Please take a look at
> http://community.kde.org/Commit_Digest_Guidelines
> > > everyone. Danny advised to use Etherpad, but they closed up shop, I
> > > assumed it was okay to use the KDE Community Wiki as well.
> > >
> > > Based on what I’ve heard from Danny and this list, I’ve added a few
> > > lines to the first paragraph and I added two criteria for exclusion of
> > > reviews. Please comment here and change it on the wiki please.
> >
> > The original CD Guidelines were written by me (based on my experience
> > with commit messages). I like your changes and additions. Thanks!
> >
> > Will we use the internal Enzyme Wiki or the Community Wiki for
> > documentation purposes? I feel that using KDE Community Wiki might be
> > the more appropriate place.
> >
> > Best regards from winter-wonderland Hannover,
> >   Marco
>
> I agree that the Community Wiki might be a more appropriate place for the
> sake
> of transparency and because of the Commit Digest’s relation to KDE.  I
> didn’t
> consciously choose it for this reason though. Danny pointed to the wiki
> page
> on Github in his previous e-mail,  I merely chose the KDE Community Wiki
> because I didn’t want to register another account with Github (I already
> have
> two pages filled with user names and passwords to remember lying around).
> Anyway, glad to hear you agree with me on the addition to the guidelines.
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digest/attachments/20101230/decf4d79/attachment.htm