specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?

[Danny Allen]

Yeah, no problem, i'm happy with the distinction between the two and the work going on there.
I'm just thinking aloud about the future documentation requirements for Enzyme itself really.

Danny


----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Pixley" <skreech2 at gmail.com>
To: "Danny Allen" <danny at commit-digest.org>
Cc: "Alexander van Loon" <a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl>, digest at kde.org
Sent: Friday, 31 December, 2010 3:04:26 AM
Subject: Re: specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?

With respect Danny the things we are discussing on the Community Wiki are really KDE specific I don't think what is a relevant commit is easily translateable to any other project. Enzyme things should certainly be on the Enzyme wiki but so far nothing we have spoken about is much use to anyone but someone interested in KDE. 


On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Danny Allen < danny at commit-digest.org > wrote: 


Hi all, 
I don't mind if we use http://community.kde.org or any other wiki to develop guidelines in, but i'd like to transfer any "finalised" content to https://github.com/dannyakakong/Enzyme/wiki for two reasons: 

* Enzyme should remain project-independent (even though the main - and only so far - user is KDE) 
* I've built nice integration of the wiki pages straight into Enzyme, and I don't want to create another system at this time 

But anyway, good work guys! (i'll add my own thoughts to the wiki soon too) 

The EtherPad thing isn't as easy to get setup on, but KDE does have an install running at http://notes-dev.kde.org/ (not that i'm advocating using it :)) 

Cheers, 
Danny 





> > Please take a look at http://community.kde.org/Commit_Digest_Guidelines 
> > everyone. Danny advised to use Etherpad, but they closed up shop, I 
> > assumed it was okay to use the KDE Community Wiki as well. 
> > 
> > Based on what I’ve heard from Danny and this list, I’ve added a few 
> > lines to the first paragraph and I added two criteria for exclusion of 
> > reviews. Please comment here and change it on the wiki please. 
> 
> The original CD Guidelines were written by me (based on my experience 
> with commit messages). I like your changes and additions. Thanks! 
> 
> Will we use the internal Enzyme Wiki or the Community Wiki for 
> documentation purposes? I feel that using KDE Community Wiki might be 
> the more appropriate place. 
> 
> Best regards from winter-wonderland Hannover, 
> Marco 

I agree that the Community Wiki might be a more appropriate place for the sake 
of transparency and because of the Commit Digest’s relation to KDE. I didn’t 
consciously choose it for this reason though. Danny pointed to the wiki page 
on Github in his previous e-mail, I merely chose the KDE Community Wiki 
because I didn’t want to register another account with Github (I already have 
two pages filled with user names and passwords to remember lying around). 
Anyway, glad to hear you agree with me on the addition to the guidelines. 
_______________________________________________ 
Digest mailing list 
Digest at kde.org 
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest