Hi and questions

[Alexander van Loon]

I’d like to correct myself, currently in the latest Commit Digest I
noticed that icons are classified in the User Interface category and are
marked as features because many icons are new. I will follow this
convention until this issue is sorted out.

On zo, 2010-12-12 at 18:45 +0100, Marco Krohn wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Good to see the mailing list is there - thanks a lot Danny!
> 
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Alexander van Loon
> <a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl> wrote:
> > Maybe an ‘Artwork’ category could be added for classifying icons? Within
> > that category it would make more sense to classify them as ‘Features’?
> > Anyway, for now I will follow Mark in labeling them as ‘Optimize’.
> 
> I agree with the suggestion to add an "artwork" category. Furthermore,
> I would suggest:
> * add "kdelibs" to "area"
> * add ""playground" to "area"
> * rename category "koffice" to "office" (to take into account the
> recent koffice split; also this allows us include the finance
> applications like skrooge)
> * remove "user interface" from "area" and move it to "type"
> 
> then icons would be categorized as "artwork" (area) / "user interface" (type).
> 
> Have a nice day,
>   Marco
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest