specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?

[Alexander van Loon]

Please take a look at http://community.kde.org/Commit_Digest_Guidelines
everyone. Danny advised to use Etherpad, but they closed up shop, I
assumed it was okay to use the KDE Community Wiki as well.

Based on what I’ve heard from Danny and this list, I’ve added a few
lines to the first paragraph and I added two criteria for exclusion of
reviews. Please comment here and change it on the wiki please. 

On ma, 2010-12-13 at 12:39 +0000, Danny Allen wrote:
> If anyone wants to start an EtherPad for the inclusion guidelines (using the text from https://github.com/dannyakakong/Enzyme/wiki/Inclusion-Guidelines-(Review) as a base) i'd welcome that. I can then add my input from my own experience later.
> 
> Then I can update the text on the wiki when we have come up with a common set of guidelines.
> 
> Cheers,
> Danny
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Pixley" <skreech2 at gmail.com>
> To: "Alexander van Loon" <a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl>
> Cc: digest at kde.org
> Sent: Monday, 13 December, 2010 2:07:04 AM
> Subject: Re: specific guideline for KDE on Windows related commits?
> 
> 
> I agree that those that are interesting should make it to the digest. I can at least speak for myself that that audience I know of the commit digest probably would not be all that interested in a build fix unless it was a long standing issue. Perhaps we can start a collaborative document to put together an Inclusion Guideline? 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Alexander van Loon < a.vanloon at alexandervanloon.nl > wrote: 
> 
> 
> Sorry for flooding the mailing list, but I simply have a lot of 
> questions. This one concerns the commits related to KDE on Windows. I’ve 
> seen a lot of commits in the directory 
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/emerge/portage/ during the 
> reviewing process. 
> 
> I thought it was something Gentoo specific because of emerge and 
> portage, but it appears that’s merely software which is used for the 
> Windows build of KDE – 
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/emerge/README?view=markup – but 
> even so, I wasn’t sure if the nature of the commits was interesting 
> enough in every case, most of the time they’re build fixes which don’t 
> seem to be interesting at all. 
> 
> So I haven’t been consistent with including and excluding these commits. 
> Can we reach an agreement on when to include or exclude them and 
> formulate a guideline for the Inclusion Guidelines? 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Digest mailing list 
> Digest at kde.org 
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest
> _______________________________________________
> Digest mailing list
> Digest at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/digest