release schedule proposal

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Wednesday 02 February 2011, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote:
> On 2 February 2011 10:05, Cyrille Berger Skott <cberger at cberger.net> wrote:
> > Only problem is that it would not really help users that would most likely
> > have to be satisfied with koffice 2.3 until we release something labeled
> > stable.
> 
> I also see something related to the recent thread about minimal Qt
> dependencies.
> IIRC 2.3 has really lower dependencies, so perhaps in order to become
> drop-in replacement we would better off if we allow for very similar
> dependencies. Thus distros would be able to deliver as many backports
> as possible. But I am not even sure about that because the new app
> names, lib names and package name(s) require rather major leap (from
> the pacakger's POV), what typically does not qualify as a backport.

Are you sure about the deps? I am fairly sure that we still compile against Qt 4.6 and KDE 4.5 -- maybe even 4.4. 

-- 
Boudewijn Rempt | http://www.valdyas.org, http://www.krita.org