urgent testing before tagging needed

[Jeff Mitchell]

Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> Heya folks :)
> 
> Jeff just found and fixed a really nasty bug with collection scanning.
> It would be really awesome if those of you compiling from git could
> update asap and give it some testing and let us know if there are any
> problems. We want to tag 2.2 final on Monday so the more testing we
> can get right now the better.

More specifically...

I think I found the reason that incremental scanning would sometimes
"lose" tracks from the collection when things were added or deleted,
with the only way to bring them back being a full rescan.

So, there are really two separate test cases that would be really good
to try out. Please start out with a full rescan, to normalize the
database before doing the incremental testing (in case this bug caused
havoc in your collection already).

1) Full rescans -- make sure everything appears normal.
2) Incremental scans -- try adding and removing bits to your collection
and see if things disappear unexpectedly (as well as making sure what
you're adding/removing does indeed change).

Thanks!
--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20090926/36b1b08a/attachment.sig>