On Terminology- sort of

[Ian Monroe]

2009/3/24 N Randolph <yoshikira at gmail.com>:
> Hey, everyone. Just a quick question (and a half...):
>
> I know Computer Scientists will do [just about] ANYTHING to make the field
> of study [sound] more sophisticated. With that, there has got to be some
> sort of term or system of terms referring to code for things like GUIs and
> code for calculating things that people who use it [usually] never see. What
> is it?
> I ask this because some part of amaroK is GUI related and done with Qt and
> some is more data manipulation like that is done with C++.    (Hey, but Qt
> _is_ C++) Yes, I know, and there is an amaroK API for anyone who would like
> to customize it to their liking. However, for the purposes of Code Testing,
> some of it will require the cppunit library and some of it will require Qt
> test library...... and if I can avoid it, I don't want to refer to the code
> needing testing with the Qt test library as "The code needing testing with
> the Qt test library" and so on.
> This question is merely for the sake of cleaner communication. Anyone with
> extensive textbook knowledge feel free to respond.
>
> Toodles
>
> -Nelson

I think cppunit test and the Qt test library do the exact same thing.
So you might as well just use the Qt test library.

(I could be wrong)

Ian