not less than

[Casey Link]

You guys have a good point. I think the nay sayers were just trying to
point out that there was an alternative way to achieve this. But being
intuitive is important. The "greater than or equal" feature is useful
and should be added (in my opinion), however it will not get added to
Amarok 1.4 (feature freeze), and I can't speak for it in Amarok 2.

Casey

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Amara Emerson <amara01emerson at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have to say almost no one writes logic "not less than". Standard
> convention is "greater than or equal to".
>
> >also the sql should be something like.  where not (value < ...)
> This isn't how it's meant to be done. None of us really think in truth
> tables, but it does make more sense to just use one operator instead
> of combining two to make what you want. It's asking for too much to
> have a whole option added, which is essentially the same as an
> existing one, just because one person thinks differently.
>
> I'm not a developer, just my opinion.
>
> Amara
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>