not less than

[Walter Little]

I agree that "greater than or equal" and "less than or equal" are useful and
would be nice to have in future versions of Amarok.

-wpl

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Casey Link <unnamedrambler at gmail.com>
wrote:

> You guys have a good point. I think the nay sayers were just trying to
> point out that there was an alternative way to achieve this. But being
> intuitive is important. The "greater than or equal" feature is useful
> and should be added (in my opinion), however it will not get added to
> Amarok 1.4 (feature freeze), and I can't speak for it in Amarok 2.
>
> Casey
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Amara Emerson <amara01emerson at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have to say almost no one writes logic "not less than". Standard
> > convention is "greater than or equal to".
> >
> > >also the sql should be something like.  where not (value < ...)
> > This isn't how it's meant to be done. None of us really think in truth
> > tables, but it does make more sense to just use one operator instead
> > of combining two to make what you want. It's asking for too much to
> > have a whole option added, which is essentially the same as an
> > existing one, just because one person thinks differently.
> >
> > I'm not a developer, just my opinion.
> >
> > Amara
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Amarok mailing list
> > Amarok at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Amarok mailing list
> Amarok at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok/attachments/20080423/643d7449/attachment.html>