Summary of my arguments _pro_ name change

[Nick Tryon]

On 6/2/06, Jeff Mitchell <kde-dev at emailgoeshere.com> wrote:
> This is actually important if we're serious about making a QT4-only version
> and a KDE-enhanced one.  People might be willing to use it if it uses QT, but
> not if it uses KDE -- one package vs. many huge monolithic ones.  This might
> also be important as we go forward with a Windows/Mac port.

So Amarok/amarok = Qt4-only version and amaroK = KDE-based version?
As appropriate and/or nifty as this might be, it seems to me like it'd
be even more confusing than the current situation.

Out of curiosity, what do the usability experts say?  Would this fall
in their domain at all?