Review Request 108905: Move UI code of PlaylistQueueEditor from .ui to .cpp file

Bart Cerneels bart.cerneels at kde.org
Mon Feb 11 17:43:37 UTC 2013



> On Feb. 11, 2013, 5:40 p.m., Bart Cerneels wrote:
> > Use a promoted widget instead. UI forms superior to this, we prefer to use them more, not less.
> > 
> > FYI the QueueEditor feature is not something we'll keep around for long. It's scheduled to be completely replaced one or two releases from now. Consider that before you spend days of useful coding time on it.

http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/designer-using-custom-widgets.html


- Bart


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108905/#review27217
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 11, 2013, 10:39 a.m., Bartosz Szreder wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108905/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 11, 2013, 10:39 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Amarok.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is the first patch (of two) resolving bug #263563
> 
> I need to create a specialized QListWidget implementation. Thus it seems easier to move the rather limited part of UI into the .cpp file and cleanly add another class with the desired modifications than to dig into .ui files with nonstandard classes.
> 
> This patch shouldn't introduce any changes in behavior yet. It's only purpose is to prepare ground for the next patch.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 263563.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=263563
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/playlist/PlaylistQueueEditor.h 40b8cdf 
>   src/playlist/PlaylistQueueEditor.cpp f647e37 
>   src/playlist/PlaylistQueueEditor.ui a05cafd 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 043dc64 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108905/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested on two different instalations, no regressions noticed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bartosz Szreder
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20130211/210d78f5/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list