Qt dependency opinion
Edward Toroshchin
edward.hades at gmail.com
Wed Apr 3 12:30:11 UTC 2013
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> The discussion is open now, if no obvious reason is given why we
> should not depend on Qt 4.8.2 in the next few days we will keep that
> dependency switch, else we will revert it.
There is no point discussing this now. At this point reverting would be
rather harmful than beneficial.
Let's just close the issue, learn from the mistakes and carry on.
--
Edward "Hades" Toroshchin
dr_lepper on irc.freenode.org
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list