Qt dependency opinion
Matěj Laitl
matej at laitl.cz
Wed Apr 3 13:54:13 UTC 2013
On 3. 4. 2013 Edward Toroshchin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:13:56PM +0200, Myriam Schweingruber wrote:
> > The discussion is open now, if no obvious reason is given why we
> > should not depend on Qt 4.8.2 in the next few days we will keep that
> > dependency switch, else we will revert it.
>
> There is no point discussing this now. At this point reverting would be
> rather harmful than beneficial.
I don't see what would be harmful about it. (this mail is not public on
purpose)
Matěj
More information about the Amarok-devel
mailing list