bittorrent support

[Jeff Mitchell]

On 4/26/2010 1:36 PM, Soren Harward wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Nanno Langstraat <langstr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On the order of 100 MiB directly attributable to Amarok. Not something
>> that I'll storm the barricades for, but OTOH you might feel it's a
>> little overweight when just playing some .mp3 files in the background.
> 
> Agreed.  The backend restructuring that moved a lot of functionality
> into the "core" library may make it possible to unload the GUI from
> memory when it's not in use.  Dynamic loading of plugins would
> probably help a bit, too.  But Amarok's always going to be on the
> heavyweight end of music players because it does a lot more than "just
> playing some .mp3 files in the background".

A while back someone did an analysis and found that a very significant
portion of the memory Amarok uses is due to qtscriptgenerator.

There was a project that Ian started with some others to work on
Smoke-like bindings to QtScript. I haven't heard anything about this in
a long time though.

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20100427/4929fb92/attachment.sig