For 2.2: Moving Rescan Collection back? (was: Re: Post-2.2: Moving Rescan Collection back)

Ian Monroe ian.monroe at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 03:09:20 CEST 2009


On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Mark Kretschmann <kretschmann at kde.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Jeff Mitchell <mitchell at kde.org> wrote:
>> Jeff Mitchell wrote:
>>> Ian Monroe wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia at kde.org> wrote:
>>>>> I generally agree. Though wasn't the reason for this being moved away
>>>>> that people shouldn't need a full rescan anyway? What happened to
>>>>> that?
>>>> Well we got that nasty bug where some tables get wrecked by the edit
>>>> track dialog.
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's on my sorta-todo for 2.3. It's going to require a lot of
>>> changes in SqlMeta and the SqlRegistry so I'm not looking forward to it.
>>> And I don't believe it's the only bug left in the SQL collection...
>>>
>>> But the point is -- they shouldn't need it, but they very frequently
>>> do...so making it superhard to find isn't really a good idea.
>>
>> Given these points --
>>
>> does it make sense to move it back now, albeit not with changed strings?
>>
>> That way it's easy for users to find in the 2.2 release. Otherwise it
>> could go into 2.2.1 (assuming).
>
> I would rather not bring it back, especially not in this menu. It was
> a constant source of confusion and it was definitely a usability
> issue.
>
> Putting it there just because of bugs in the program smells like a
> workaround... or in other words, a hack. We did this a lot in Amarok
> 1, and the tangled UI in some parts was the result.

Yea, but we don't have much choice. We can't just pretend that major
problems don't exist when they do.

Ian


More information about the Amarok-devel mailing list