For 2.2: Moving Rescan Collection back? (was: Re: Post-2.2: Moving Rescan Collection back)

[Jeff Mitchell]

Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> Ian Monroe wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Lydia Pintscher <lydia at kde.org> wrote:
>>> I generally agree. Though wasn't the reason for this being moved away
>>> that people shouldn't need a full rescan anyway? What happened to
>>> that?
>> Well we got that nasty bug where some tables get wrecked by the edit
>> track dialog.
> 
> Yeah, it's on my sorta-todo for 2.3. It's going to require a lot of
> changes in SqlMeta and the SqlRegistry so I'm not looking forward to it.
> And I don't believe it's the only bug left in the SQL collection...
> 
> But the point is -- they shouldn't need it, but they very frequently
> do...so making it superhard to find isn't really a good idea.

Given these points --

does it make sense to move it back now, albeit not with changed strings?

That way it's easy for users to find in the 2.2 release. Otherwise it
could go into 2.2.1 (assuming).

--Jeff

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20090923/15dbb2ed/attachment.sig