Time based releases?

[Alex Merry]

On Monday 16 March 2009 11:59:23 Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> For Amarok 2 this was changed (although it was never properly
> discussed) to this new scheme, where "beta1" would become "1.9.0" or
> so. I understand this was done for technical reasons (easier for
> packagers), but I was never happy with it and found it confusing.

Quite frankly, any sane package manager should be able to figure out that 
2.0beta1 < 2.0 == 2.0.0.  Even pacman, the package manager with almost no 
features, manages that.

Alex


-- 
Why have I got six monitors?  Because I haven't got room for eight.
  -- Terry Pratchett

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/amarok-devel/attachments/20090316/7e738089/attachment.sig